Interspeech 2022 2022
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2022-908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived prominence and downstep in Japanese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical results of Hirayama and Hwang (2016), Hwang and Hirayama (2021), and Kubozono (1992) are opposite to those reported in Selkirk and Tateishi (1991). Kubozono (1992) reports that downstep occurs in [N 1 [N 2 N 3 ]].…”
Section: Japanese Downstep and Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The empirical results of Hirayama and Hwang (2016), Hwang and Hirayama (2021), and Kubozono (1992) are opposite to those reported in Selkirk and Tateishi (1991). Kubozono (1992) reports that downstep occurs in [N 1 [N 2 N 3 ]].…”
Section: Japanese Downstep and Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The review shows that different kinds of syntactic information may block downstep, while not all syntactic boundaries affect it. We discuss the effects of maximal projection boundaries (Selkirk and Tateishi 1991), the boundary between the subject noun phrase (NP) and predicate verb phrase (VP) Ishihara 2016), relative clause boundaries , and parts of speech (Selkirk and Tateishi 1991;Hwang 2016, 2019;Hwang and Hirayama 2021) on downstep. Selkirk and Tateishi (1991) argue that the left edges of maximal projections, or XPs, block downstep.…”
Section: Japanese Downstep and Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations