2015
DOI: 10.1002/jaoc.12005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Norms, Outcome Expectancies, and Collegiate Drinking: Examining the Mediating Role of Drinking Motives

Abstract: The authors examined the mediational role of drinking motives in explaining the associations among psychosocial antecedents and collegiate drinking. Results indicated that drinking motives partially mediated the relationships between outcome expectancies, perceived norms, alcohol use intensity, and alcohol‐related negative consequences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
8
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(106 reference statements)
5
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As hypothesized, drinking motives were positively associated with greater drinking frequency, drinking quantity, and alcohol-related problems, which is in line with previous literature (Foster & Neighbors, 2013; Piasecki, Cooper, Wood, Sher, Shiffman, & Heath, 2014; Wahesh, Lewis, Wyrick, & Ackerman, 2015). Of note, sex was significantly associated with drinking frequency and alcohol-related problems for Asian young adults only, such that males reported drinking alcohol more frequency and experiencing more problems related to alcohol (e.g., Missed a day (or part of a day) of school or work; Had a fight, argument or bad feeling with a friend).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As hypothesized, drinking motives were positively associated with greater drinking frequency, drinking quantity, and alcohol-related problems, which is in line with previous literature (Foster & Neighbors, 2013; Piasecki, Cooper, Wood, Sher, Shiffman, & Heath, 2014; Wahesh, Lewis, Wyrick, & Ackerman, 2015). Of note, sex was significantly associated with drinking frequency and alcohol-related problems for Asian young adults only, such that males reported drinking alcohol more frequency and experiencing more problems related to alcohol (e.g., Missed a day (or part of a day) of school or work; Had a fight, argument or bad feeling with a friend).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These motives are defined as: social (anticipating favorable social outcomes, such as having fun at a party); conformity (avoiding social rejection or gaining acceptance peers); coping (alleviating negative affect, such as to forget one’s problems); and enhancement (increasing positive affect or experiencing a pleasant feeling) motives (Cooper, 1994; MacLean & Lecci, 2000). Further, research has provided a framework that conceptualizes these drinking motives as strong factors in alcohol consumption (e.g., Piasecki, Cooper, Wood, Sher, Shiffman, & Heath, 2014; Wahesh, Lewis, Wyrick, & Ackerman, 2015), even remaining relatively invariant during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood (Anderson, Briggs, & White, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The completely standardized indirect effect for alcohol‐related negative consequences was small ( ab cs = .06), indicating that two participants who differ by one standard deviation unit in their distress intolerance are estimated to differ by .06 standard deviations, or less than one negative consequence, as a result of their reported coping drinking motives. Despite the modest effect sizes observed in the present study, it should be noted that these indirect relationships were established while controlling for variables that have been identified as robust predictors of young adult alcohol use, such as enhancement drinking motives (Wahesh et al, ). Thus, consideration of DT as a determinant of alcohol consumption and alcohol‐related negative consequences within this population appears warranted.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Cooper (1994) defined these categories as coping (i.e., drinking to alleviate unpleasant emotional states), enhancement (i.e., drinking to increase positive emotional states), conformity (i.e., drinking to prevent social rejection), and social reinforcement (i.e., drinking for social reward). Among these motives for alcohol use, coping motives have been found to be particularly important in explaining drinking and alcohol-related negative consequences among young adults within college (Wahesh et al, 2015) and noncollege samples (Veilleux et al, 2014). Furthermore, although individuals may endorse multiple reasons for typical alcohol use, coping drinking motives appear to be most relevant in understanding the relationship between DT and drinking, as these motives represent efforts to relieve unpleasant emotional states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…College students tend to endorse social and enhancement motives (positive reinforcement motives) most frequently followed by coping and conformity motives (negative reinforcement motives; Cooper et al, 2016;Gmel et al, 2012;Kuntsche et al, 2005). However, coping motives are more closely associated with problematic drinking than positive reinforcement motives (Cooper et al, 1995;Holahan et al, 2001;Vernig & Orsillo, 2015;Wahesh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Motivational Drinking Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%