2018
DOI: 10.1177/0091647118794242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Longitudinal Effects of SLMTs

Abstract: This current study analyzed the long-term holistic development of intercultural competency in undergraduates who participated in a short-term service-learning missions trip (SLMT). We compared alumni who had participated in the program against a control group who did not. As expected, the SLMT group had significantly higher perceived intercultural competency in the scales of Knowledge, Awareness, Behavior, Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Growth, Intellect, and Spirituality. It was also found that alumni who pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study reflected that for our participants, the themes reflected not only an internalization of the experience, but also led to several forms of personal and professional awareness and advocacy. While we were excited to see the advocacy and community involvement, we were intrigued that spirituality and meaning-making work also occurred, which is reflected in other study abroad literature (Burrows et al, 2018;Wolcott & Motyka, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The findings of this study reflected that for our participants, the themes reflected not only an internalization of the experience, but also led to several forms of personal and professional awareness and advocacy. While we were excited to see the advocacy and community involvement, we were intrigued that spirituality and meaning-making work also occurred, which is reflected in other study abroad literature (Burrows et al, 2018;Wolcott & Motyka, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Unfortunately, most studies have focused on the effects of STMs on volunteers (e.g., Burrows et al, 2018; Trinitapoli & Vaisey, 2009; Walling et al, 2006) and neglected the effects on recipients. Limitations of existing studies, coupled with the rise in prevalence and controversy surrounding STMs, suggest a pressing need to address this gap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%