“…While researchers have different views about whether both conceptual persuasion knowledge and skepticism are formally part of the persuasion knowledge construct (see e.g., Boerman, van Reijmersdal, & Neijens, ; Boush et al, ; Obermiller & Spangenberg, ; Rozendaal et al, , ), most persuasion knowledge research has tended to assume a link between the two (e.g., DeRosia, ; Hibbert et al, ; Pounders, Moulard, & Babin, ; Schindler, Morrin, & Bechwati, ; Stafford, ; Tarabashkina, Quester, & Tarabashkina, ; Wentzel et al, ). For example, researchers have asserted that when consumers are prompted to access conceptual persuasion knowledge, they consequently “regard the marketer's claims with greater suspicion and may infer that the marketer is deceptive and manipulative” (Wentzel et al, , p. 513), they become “skeptical about the persuasive intent of an advertiser” (Phillips & McQuarrie, , p. 384), and they respond with “protective mechanisms, such as increased skepticism” (Wojdynski & Evans, ).…”