Perceived Gaps in Genetics Training Among Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists: Lessons From a National Survey

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, self-rated confidence, and perceived relevance of genetics in the clinical practice of audiologists and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) toward a better understanding of the need for genetics education, given that genetics plays a growing role in the diagnosis of hearing impairment and communication disorders. Method A survey consisting of 8 demographic items and 16 content questions was returned by 233 audiologists and 283 SLPs. Knowledge of applied genetics was queried with clinical scenarios in a multiple-choice format. Self-assessment of clinical confidence and perceived relevance of genetics in one's field was queried with questions and statements rated on 5-point Likert scales. The benefit of additional training in genetics was rated with a yes/no question, and if answered with yes, suggested topics were entered. Results A large significant gap between confidence in one's own genetics skills and the perceived relevance of genetics was evident, regardless of professional group. Over one third of the audiologists and over two thirds of the SLPs indicated low or somewhat low confidence in their own ability to implement principles of genetics, whereas over two thirds of both groups agreed that genetics is relevant for their field. Regardless of group, confidence scores were significantly and positively associated with relevance scores. Over 80% of respondents in both groups indicated that they would benefit from additional training in genetics. Most commonly suggested topics included genetic causes, general information about genetics, and making referrals. Conclusion Both audiologists and SLPs felt that genetics is relevant for their fields and that additional training in genetics would be beneficial. Future studies should evaluate the effect of genetics training on patient outcomes and the need for incorporating genetics more extensively into audiology and speech-language pathology training programs.

Translating principles of precision medicine into speech-language pathology: Clinical trial of a proactive speech and language intervention for infants with classic galactosemia

“…In a recent survey, SLPs were aware of the emerging relevance of genetics in their field and indicated that additional training in genetics would be beneficial. 49 …”

Three children with different de novo BCL11A variants and diverse developmental phenotypes, but shared global motor discoordination and apraxic speech: Evidence for a functional gene network influencing the developing cerebellum and motor and auditory cortices

“…In these cases, clinical providers can help trigger an appropriate referral to a genetics professional. However, many clinical providers report that in order recognize signs of a genetic variant and to make a referral, they would need additional training in genetics (Peter, Dougherty, et al, 2019). Such training has the potential of increasing clinical referrals to genetics professionals, which may result in multiple benefits for the individual and family in question, including closure when learning the genetic etiology, anticipatory guidance, and personalized and proactive clinical management.…”

Scoping the Scene: What Do Nurses, Midwives, and Allied Health Professionals Need and Want to Know About Genomics?

“…Wright et al (2019) reported a high perceived relevance or importance of genomics to practice among Australian nurses and midwives but a low level of genomics knowledge. A recent US study of audiologists (2019) and speech pathologists reported low confidence in their ability to implement principles of genetics, but over two-thirds agreed genetics was relevant for their field (Peter et al, 2019).…”