2004
DOI: 10.1159/000080352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Family Difficulties and Prediction of 23-Year Stroke Mortality among Middle-Aged Men

Abstract: Background/Objective: To examine the association of indicators of family problems, support and coping style and prediction of stroke mortality among a large cohort of middle-aged men. Methods: A cohort of 10,059 men aged ≧40 years at study inclusion that were tenured civil servants or municipal employees were followed for mortality over 23 years, for a total of about 200,000 person-years of follow-up. Mortality attributed to stroke and to CHD as underlying causes was determined. Subjects underwent a structured… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This limits our ability to characterize the type of RT. Of note, though, indicators for perceived family problems, family support and coping style as assessed at baseline in the IIHD have also been demonstrated to be related to a long-term risk of dying from stroke [42] , similar to findings on other groups [43,44] , supporting the content validity. Additionally, depression, an important contributor to and result of some forms of RT, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This limits our ability to characterize the type of RT. Of note, though, indicators for perceived family problems, family support and coping style as assessed at baseline in the IIHD have also been demonstrated to be related to a long-term risk of dying from stroke [42] , similar to findings on other groups [43,44] , supporting the content validity. Additionally, depression, an important contributor to and result of some forms of RT, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In fact, the effects of negative exchanges often outweigh the effects of positive exchanges (see reviews by Brooks & Dunkel Schetter, 2011; Rook, 1998). For example, negative interaction, but not positive interaction, has been found in large prospective studies to predict allostatic load (dysregulation across multiple physiological systems that underlies many chronic diseases; Seeman, Gruenewald, Cohen, Williams, & Matthews, 2014), hypertension (Sneed & Cohen, 2014), incident coronary events (De Vogli, Chandola, & Marmot, 2007), and mortality due to stroke (Tanne, Goldbourt, & Medalie, 2004). Whether different kinds of negative interactions have specific health effects is not well understood, but they may evoke distinctive negative emotions (such as anger versus sadness) that, in turn, have distinctive health effects (Kiecolt-Glaser, McGuire, Robles, & Glaser, 2002).…”
Section: Evidence Linking Positive and Negative Social Exchanges To Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many instances, negative interactions may cause individuals to have some reservations about the relationship. Negative interactions may constitute direct sources of stress that are associated with adverse mental and physical states (Almeida & Horn, 2004; Cohen et al, 1997; King, Atienza, Castro, & Collins, 2002; Newsom, Nishishiba, Morgan, & Rook, 2003; Rook, 1984; Seeman & Chen, 2002; Tanne, Goldbourt, & Medalie, 2004). Negative interactions and other interpersonal stressors arouse high levels of distress for individuals (Zautra, Burleson, Matt, Roth, & Burrows, 1994) and persist over a long period of time (Bolger, DeLongis, Kessler, & Schilling, 1989).…”
Section: Social Support and Negative Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%