2022
DOI: 10.1080/07481756.2022.2030238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Familial Stigma of Sexuality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Perceived Familial Stigma of Sexuality Scale (PFSS; Vidales et al, 2019) is a 30-item self-report assessment of the perceived stigma LGBTQ-identified participants experienced from their immediate family members (e.g., “My family makes openly homophobic statements in my presence”). Participants responded to items on a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from 0 ( not at all) to 4 ( very much so ) with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived familial stigma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Perceived Familial Stigma of Sexuality Scale (PFSS; Vidales et al, 2019) is a 30-item self-report assessment of the perceived stigma LGBTQ-identified participants experienced from their immediate family members (e.g., “My family makes openly homophobic statements in my presence”). Participants responded to items on a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from 0 ( not at all) to 4 ( very much so ) with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived familial stigma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor and confirmatory analytic results across two samples who identified as gay/lesbian, bisexual, queer/pansexual supported the use of a total score. The PFSS total score has internal consistency (α = .97) and validity with correlations with perceptions of daily heterosexist experiences (.78), parental warmth, hostility, neglect, and rejection, and current experiences of depression (24–.41; Vidales et al, 2019). PFSS scores in the current sample showed similar internal consistency (α = .98).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%