2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived duration decreases with increasing eccentricity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, this would result in the observed underestimation of Memento trials. The same argument holds true for eccentricity (Kliegl & Huckauf, 2014).…”
Section: Linking the Memento Effect To Isolated Effects Of Perceived supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Consequently, this would result in the observed underestimation of Memento trials. The same argument holds true for eccentricity (Kliegl & Huckauf, 2014).…”
Section: Linking the Memento Effect To Isolated Effects Of Perceived supporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, one could argue that also in the present study each of the four experimental groups only comprised 12 and 13 participants, respectively. Yet, many experimental psychological studies are based on similar sample sizes (e.g., Doi and Shinohara, 2009 ; Gil and Droit-Volet, 2011b ; Kliegl and Huckauf, 2014 ). For instance, Doi and Shinohara (2009) only tested 11 participants and observed a well explainable and approved effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is defined as the 50% threshold at which the subject shows a maximum of uncertainty when estimating the duration of a stimulus. It is calculated by fitting a logistic function to the observed relation between the “long” ratings and the actual stimulus durations (compare Tipples, 2008 ; Kliegl and Huckauf, 2014 ). This procedure is graphically illustrated in Figure 3 for stimuli presented with 0° face direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different factors influence the perceived duration of a stimulus. For example the location of stimuli (Kliegl & Huckauf, 2014), the presence of a second task (Brown, 2008), the allocated attention to the stimulus (Macar, Grondin, & Casini, 1994;Tse, Intriligator, Rivest, & Cavanagh, 2004), affective factors (Angrilli, Cherubini, Pavese, & Manfredini, 1997), or the temporal task itself (Gil & Droit-Volet, 2011). It is beyond the scope of this study to discuss all these factors, but clearly more research is needed to fully understand the interactions of time perception with crossmodal auditory-visual stimuli.…”
Section: Auditory Dominance In Crossmodal Congruence In Temporal Discmentioning
confidence: 90%