2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Desirability of Vocal Fry Among Female Speech Communication Disorders Graduate Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Ligon et al (2019) need to be considered separately as they had a different methodological set-up than the other papers. Although their focus was on the perception of vocal fry, they also included other voice qualities that the participants needed to rate (Ligon et al 2019, 805.e23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of Ligon et al (2019) need to be considered separately as they had a different methodological set-up than the other papers. Although their focus was on the perception of vocal fry, they also included other voice qualities that the participants needed to rate (Ligon et al 2019, 805.e23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A unique study in terms of their methodology was Ligon et al (2019). In this study, the Speech Communication Disorder students were asked to rate 25 adjectives in terms of their desirability on a scale of 1 (desirable) to 3 (undesirable) (Ligon et al 2019, 805.e23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study using speech communication disorders students as raters, Ligon, Rountrey, Rank, Hull, and Khidr (2019) concur that negative adjectives can be applied to the voice quality of vocal fry, such as “vain,” “apathetic/disinterested,” “sleepy,” and “bored/unengaged,” but they found that some of their participants also used adjectives like “relaxed/chill,” “sophisticated,” “sexy,” and “cool” to describe creaky voice in female speakers 2 . They speculate that women may use creaky phonation in some social situations “to avoid being called lively and aggressive, too feminine and sweet, or worse yet, insecure/hesitant (p. 14).” This “low activation” connotation of creaky phonation is also seen in Gobl and Ni Chasaide (2003), though in their case the low‐energy words applied to creaky phonation (and other non‐modal phonation like breathy) had both positive and negative valence (e.g., “relaxed,” “intimate,” and “bored”).…”
Section: Social Uses and Perceptual Evaluation Of Creaky Phonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… A limitation of Ligon et al (2019) is that the participants were not rating actual speech samples, but rather the concept of the voice quality itself, after participating in a training on voice qualities as part of their graduate study. Though even rating voice samples may come with confounds, the Ligon et al method may introduce even more bias if the students had been taught that some voice qualities are pathological or dispreferred among voice professionals. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 People who use creaky voice may be judged more negatively than people who do not use creak. [29][30][31][32] Creaky voice is rated as less natural, and it requires more concentration from the listener than non-creaky voice. It may also negatively impact a listener's rating of a speaker's employability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%