2016
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2016.1185081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Control and Hedonic Tone Dynamics During Performance in Elite Shooters

Abstract: Consistent with the MAP model conceptualization, the findings provided support for the different patterns of perceived control and hedonic tone intensity scores during performance. The results suggest applied arguments for using action- and emotion-centered strategies to help athletes in reaching and sustaining optimal performance states.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings lend support to previous evidence suggesting that fine-tuned activation in the sensorimotor cortex is essential to producing more automatic processing in skilled performance (Baumeister et al, 2008). These observations are in line with the psychomotor efficiency hypothesis and the Type 1 performance state of the MAP model (Bortoli et al, 2012;Robazza et al, 2016), which suggests that optimal performance is constructed by a more automated manner with minimal conscious on performance control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings lend support to previous evidence suggesting that fine-tuned activation in the sensorimotor cortex is essential to producing more automatic processing in skilled performance (Baumeister et al, 2008). These observations are in line with the psychomotor efficiency hypothesis and the Type 1 performance state of the MAP model (Bortoli et al, 2012;Robazza et al, 2016), which suggests that optimal performance is constructed by a more automated manner with minimal conscious on performance control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The best performance in our study is consistent with the Type 1 performance state construed within the MAP model Di Fronso et al, 2016), which suggests that less conscious control on performance is related to the optimalautomatic motor performance. Therefore, psychomotor efficiency could be considered as a part of the optimal performance categorized by the MAP model, indicating that the degree of perceived control separates the Type 1 (Efficient processing) performance from the Type 2 (Effortful processing) performance (Bortoli, Bertollo, Hanin, & Robazza, 2012;Robazza, Bertollo, Filho, Hanin, & Bortoli, 2016). As previous studies have shown that alpha coherence is related to top-down processing, which might converge the sensory input from multiple areas (Von Stein & Sarnthein, 2000), our study indicates that examining SMR power is prospective and influential for understanding the psychomotor processing in precision sports (Cheng et al, 2015b(Cheng et al, , 2015a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we expected to observe more cortical synchronization in Type and Type performance states (see Figure 1). This hypothesis relies on earlier findings that showed some similar psychophysiological features underlying Type 1 and Type 4 performances (Bertollo et al, 2013, di Fronso et al, 2016, Robazza, Bertollo, Filho, Hanin, & Bortoli, 2016. On the other hand, we expected to observe more cortical desynchronization associated with Type 2 and Type 3 performance states.…”
Section: The Present Studysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Individualized strategies are also a main focus of the individual zones of optimal functioning (IZOF) model in which pleasant and unpleasant emotional states can exert beneficial, detrimental, or both effects on performance, depending on their individual meaning and intensity 3 . Drawing on the IZOF model, Robazza and colleagues 4 recently proposed the multi-action plan (MAP) model, an idiosyncratic approach aimed to enhance and optimize performance based on both emotion and action self-regulatory strategies. This model, in particular, places emphasis on the interaction between performance level and attentional control level during task execution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%