2016
DOI: 10.5750/ejpch.v4i2.1090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived changes to quality of life indicators following a physical activity intervention for recovering cancer patients: A qualitative study.

Abstract: Aim:The aim of this study was to examine the perceived changes in quality of life (QoL) for a group of recovering cancer patients, following 6 months of physical activity. Background: Evidence suggests that physical activity can improve the QoL of recovering cancer patients, reducing many of the side-effects of cancer and its related treatments, including depression, anxiety, chronic fatigue, with an improvement in physical and psychological health. Method: A qualitative study with 14 mixed site cancer patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following data analysis techniques were applied to the 3 studies by Queen et al [5,7,8]. The memoranda that emerged from the 3 previous coding processes were used as the method for generating grounded theory in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The following data analysis techniques were applied to the 3 studies by Queen et al [5,7,8]. The memoranda that emerged from the 3 previous coding processes were used as the method for generating grounded theory in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first author advanced theoretical development through selective coding and the application of the axial coding paradigm. For details, see Queen et al, [5,7,8], the fourth author assisted by reviewing this process [27]. Memoranda were used to explore the different dimensions of the emergent themes from the axial coded data and the first author reviewed this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations