Perceived Benefits Matter the Most in COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors: Empirical Evidence from Okara District, Pakistan

Shah, Gulzar H.; Faraz, Ansar Ali; Khan, Hina; Waterfield, Kristie Cason

doi:10.3390/ijerph18136772

Cited by 16 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 24 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Our study found a strong negative association between perceived benefits and the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Considering a particular action (in this case, receiving vaccination) as effective in preventing a disease, which is perceived benefits according to HBM constructs, motivates individuals in adopting the behaviors [ 54 ]. On the other hand, perceived barriers were positively associated with vaccine hesitancy in our study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the adult population in Bangladesh: A nationwide cross-sectional survey

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Studies related to the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy are scanty in Bangladesh, despite the growing necessity of understanding the population behavior related to vaccination. Thus, the present study was conducted to assess the prevalence of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and its associated factors in Bangladesh to fill the knowledge gap. Methods and materials This study adopted a cross-sectional design to collect data from 1497 respondents using online (Google forms) and face-to-face interviews from eight administrative divisions of Bangladesh between 1–7 February 2021. We employed descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis. Results The prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 46.2%. The Muslims (aOR = 1.80, p ≤ 0.01) and the respondents living in the city corporation areas (aOR = 2.14, p ≤0.001) had more hesitancy. There was significant variation in vaccine hesitancy by administrative divisions (geographic regions). Compared to the Sylhet division, the participants from Khulna (aOR = 1.31, p ≤0.001) had higher hesitancy. The vaccine hesitancy tended to decrease with increasing knowledge about the vaccine (aOR = 0.88, p≤0.001) and the vaccination process (aOR = 0.91, p ≤ 0.01). On the other hand, hesitancy increased with the increased negative attitudes towards the vaccine (aOR = 1.17, p≤0.001) and conspiracy beliefs towards the COVID-19 vaccine (aOR = 1.04, p≤0.01). The perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccination (aOR = 0.85, p≤0.001) were negatively associated with hesitancy, while perceived barriers (aOR = 1.16, p ≤0.001) were positively associated. The participants were more hesitant to accept the vaccine from a specific country of origin (India, USA, Europe). Conclusions Our findings warrant that a vigorous behavior change communication campaign should be designed and implemented to demystify negative public attitudes and conspiracy beliefs regarding the COVID-19 Vaccine in Bangladesh. The policymakers should also think about revisiting the policy of the online registration process to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, as online registration is a key structural barrier for many due to the persistent digital divide in the country. Finally, the government should consider the population’s preference regarding vaccines’ country of manufacture to reduce the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the adult population in Bangladesh: A nationwide cross-sectional survey

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In particular, a meta-analysis of HBM studies indicated that perceived benefit was the most powerful predictor among all the health belief factors [ 30 ]. Moreover, a study in the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that the perceived benefits of preventative actions were positively associated with individuals’ intentions to take these actions [ 31 ]. Hence, we postulate the following hypothesis:…”

Section: Theoretical Model and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination Using the Health Belief Model: Does Information Acquisition from Divergent Sources Make a Difference?

Yang

Wei

Liu

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a promising approach to stop the escalation of the pandemic, COVID-19 vaccine promotion is becoming a challenging task for authorities worldwide. The purpose of this study was to identify the effective sources for disseminating information on the COVID-19 vaccine to promote individuals’ behavioral intention to take the vaccine. Based on the Health Belief Model (HBM), this study illustrated the mechanism of how COVID-19 information acquisition from different sources was transformed into vaccination intentions via health beliefs. Using an online survey in China, the structural equation model results revealed that perceived benefits and cues to action were positively associated with COVID-19 vaccination intentions, and perceived barriers were negatively related to the intentions. However, perceived susceptibility and perceived severity had no significant relationships with the intentions. Moreover, the findings unveiled differences in the effects of acquiring information via multiple sources among traditional media, new media, and interpersonal interactions. Notably, new media and interpersonal interactions were more salient in promoting vaccination intention via health beliefs, compared with traditional media. The findings from this study will benefit health officials in terms of utilizing different information sources in vaccine programs.

show abstract

“…However, in another study conducted on the intentions for the uptake of H1N1 influenza vaccine, no evidence was found for a significant relation for P-SUS and P-SEV, whereas P-BEN and P-BAR were significant predictors of vaccine uptake [23]. Likewise, in a study conducted in Pakistan, Shah and colleagues (2021) [30] evaluated the role of HBM constructs in the adherence of preventive measure of COVID-19 and found the significant role of P-BEN, while the role of all other constructs in the adoption of preventive behavior, including cues-to-action, remained insignificant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance in the Context of the Health Belief Model: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in Punjab, Pakistan

Zakar¹,

Momina²,

Shahzad³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the models that could be used to understand the adoption of vaccine uptake is the Health Belief Model (HBM). The aim of this study is to assess the role of HBM constructs and perceived health status (PHS) on vaccination status of individuals and to understand the role of socio-demographic variables on HBM scoring. A comparative cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted among 1,325 vaccinated (60.0%) and non-vaccinated (40.0%) vaccinated individuals aged 40 years and above in July 2021 in Punjab province, Pakistan. A higher level of education was the strongest predictor of positive HBM. All constructs of HBM, PHS and cues-to-action were significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccination uptake with perceived benefits as the strongest predictor. In order to expand the vaccination coverage, doubled pronged interventions utilizing both ICT and human resources should be designed that address each barrier perceived by individuals and understandably communicate the benefits of COVID-19 vaccine to the broader population.

show abstract

Perceived Benefits Matter the Most in COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors: Empirical Evidence from Okara District, Pakistan

Cited by 16 publications

References 24 publications

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the adult population in Bangladesh: A nationwide cross-sectional survey

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the adult population in Bangladesh: A nationwide cross-sectional survey

Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination Using the Health Belief Model: Does Information Acquisition from Divergent Sources Make a Difference?

COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance in the Context of the Health Belief Model: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in Punjab, Pakistan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About