2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.03.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived barriers to the use of sedation protocols and daily sedation interruption: A multidisciplinary survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
119
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
119
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the response rate to our questionnaire was 43%. While this response rate is within the range of other recently published surveys of critical care professionals [37][38][39][40], our study could certainly be limited by sampling bias. Regarding the potential for sampling bias, the large proportion of female questionnaire-recipients (95%), and respondents (94%), is consistent with existing data showing that 96% of United States SLPs are female [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…First, the response rate to our questionnaire was 43%. While this response rate is within the range of other recently published surveys of critical care professionals [37][38][39][40], our study could certainly be limited by sampling bias. Regarding the potential for sampling bias, the large proportion of female questionnaire-recipients (95%), and respondents (94%), is consistent with existing data showing that 96% of United States SLPs are female [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…factors, lack of familiarity of resident physicians with the protocols, physicians' personal preference, lack of nursing support, and fear of oversedation have been cited as reasons associated with noncompliance with protocols. 18,30,31 When examining use of protocols, it has been reported that practitioners working in larger or university-affiliated ICUs are more likely to use sedation or pain protocols, 32 and protocol use ranges from 20% to 90%. 18,[30][31][32][33] Actual adherence, however, ranges from 20% to 58%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e use of daily interruption for patients receiving continuous infusions occurs inconsistently, with surveys reporting 40 to 62% rates of compliance [38][39][40][41]. In addition, despite the perception that sedation scales are benefi cial, only 47-60% of ICUs had implemented sedation protocols at the time of the survey [39][40][41], and 85.6% of physicians in a Brazilian survey indeed believed their patients were usually over-sedated [41]. Th e same survey reported sedation levels being assessed 2 times or less per day in over 50% of patients.…”
Section: Practical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%