Abstract:The Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS) social skills intervention has demonstrated effectiveness for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, studies have been limited by a lack of objective outcome measures and an underrepresentation of Latinx families. This pilot study extends the PEERS literature by utilizing an observational measure of conversational skills (Contextual Assessment of Social Skills; CASS) with a diverse sample of 13 adolescents with ASD (wi… Show more
“…This is one of the first investigations to examine the effects of intervention, educational self‐concept, and neural correlates of reward in a historically marginalized population of Latinx autistic teens and a neurotypical comparison group. Findings support previous work showing social improvements after completion of the PEERS program (e.g., Laugeson, Gantman, Kapp, Orenski, & Ellingsen, 2015; Veytsman et al, 2022) and showcase the need for the inclusion of diverse samples in future intervention research studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous publications reporting data from this sample have reported perceived and observed improvements in social behaviors in autistic teens after the completion of PEERS (Laugeson, 2013) (Baker, Veytsman, Choy, Blacher, & Stavropoulos, 2021;Veytsman et al, 2022). Specifically, teens displayed improved social responsiveness and social skills, which was corroborated by observed improvements in their conversational skills.…”
Thirteen autistic teens, who were predominantly Latinx, completed the Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS), a 16‐week social skills intervention. Time‐frequency decomposition was calculated using advanced electroencephalographic techniques to measure oscillatory brain activity during reward anticipation and processing before and after PEERS. Fourteen neurotypical teens participated but did not receive intervention. The perception of educational performance was also measured. The perception of educational performance did not differ between groups and did not change after participation in PEERS. Approach motivation increased after intervention in the autistic group. This suggests an enhancement of social motivation after learning social skills in a group composed of a majority of Latinx autistic teens.
“…This is one of the first investigations to examine the effects of intervention, educational self‐concept, and neural correlates of reward in a historically marginalized population of Latinx autistic teens and a neurotypical comparison group. Findings support previous work showing social improvements after completion of the PEERS program (e.g., Laugeson, Gantman, Kapp, Orenski, & Ellingsen, 2015; Veytsman et al, 2022) and showcase the need for the inclusion of diverse samples in future intervention research studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous publications reporting data from this sample have reported perceived and observed improvements in social behaviors in autistic teens after the completion of PEERS (Laugeson, 2013) (Baker, Veytsman, Choy, Blacher, & Stavropoulos, 2021;Veytsman et al, 2022). Specifically, teens displayed improved social responsiveness and social skills, which was corroborated by observed improvements in their conversational skills.…”
Thirteen autistic teens, who were predominantly Latinx, completed the Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS), a 16‐week social skills intervention. Time‐frequency decomposition was calculated using advanced electroencephalographic techniques to measure oscillatory brain activity during reward anticipation and processing before and after PEERS. Fourteen neurotypical teens participated but did not receive intervention. The perception of educational performance was also measured. The perception of educational performance did not differ between groups and did not change after participation in PEERS. Approach motivation increased after intervention in the autistic group. This suggests an enhancement of social motivation after learning social skills in a group composed of a majority of Latinx autistic teens.
Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often experience lifelong social communication challenges and are more vulnerable to school bullying. Addressing their social difficulties and school bullying requires evidence‐based interventions. PEERS® (Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills) was adapted and translated for Taiwanese adolescents. This randomized controlled study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the Taiwanese version of PEERS® in reducing school bullying and enhancing social function among autistic adolescents. Twenty‐one autistic adolescents (mean age 14.29 ± 1.67 years; female n = 733.33%) were randomized to a treatment group (TG, n = 10) or a delayed treatment control group (DTG, n = 11). The outcome measures (school bullying, social challenges, social skills knowledge, and social skills performance) were assessed at baseline, post‐treatment, and follow‐up. The group and time interaction analyses revealed greater magnitudes of reduction in general school bullying (p < 0.001), victimization (p < 0.001), perpetration (p = 0.012), social challenges (p = 0.001), and peer conflicts (p < 0.001), and improvement in social knowledge (p < 0.001) in the TG group than the DTG group. The findings suggest that the PEERS® program tailored for Taiwanese adolescents is effective in reducing school bullying, decreasing social challenges, and enhancing social skills among autistic adolescents, with very large effect sizes (Cohen's d ranging from 1.19 to 2.88). Consequently, participation in the PEERS® program is recommended for adolescents with social difficulties to improve their social communication and interactions to offset school bullying and other social challenges related to adverse outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.