2007
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Ambiguity about Screening Mammography Recommendations: Association with Future Mammography Uptake and Perceptions

Abstract: Conflicting expert recommendations regarding cancer screening and prevention are growing in number, visibility, and importance, but their impact are not well understood. In this study, we examined the impact of conflicting recommendations about mammography screening on women's mammography behavior and perceptions. We conducted a secondary analysis of longitudinal data from the 1995 Maximizing Mammography Participation Trial, a large randomized interventional trial examining the effectiveness of patient reminde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
57
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While a previous study has shown that semiannual mammography is associated with a low yield of detection for invasive cancer recurrence at the initial 6-month surveillance examination (29), we recommend continuous semiannual surveillance for 5 years to avoid confusing our patients with a complex protocol that appears to include some and skip other 6-month examinations. Confusion concerning mammography protocols has been shown to lead to decreased compliance (30). We also were unable to analyze the effect of biannual-interval examinations because very few patients had such intervals, as compliance with the semiannual protocol was high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While a previous study has shown that semiannual mammography is associated with a low yield of detection for invasive cancer recurrence at the initial 6-month surveillance examination (29), we recommend continuous semiannual surveillance for 5 years to avoid confusing our patients with a complex protocol that appears to include some and skip other 6-month examinations. Confusion concerning mammography protocols has been shown to lead to decreased compliance (30). We also were unable to analyze the effect of biannual-interval examinations because very few patients had such intervals, as compliance with the semiannual protocol was high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies have shown that physicians may assume that parents prefer not to hear about scientific uncertainty, a concept that has been labeled "ambiguity aversion" [18][19][20]. This likely stems from physicians' own discomfort with uncertainty [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greek general practitioners have demonstrated a limited awareness of international recommendations for breast cancer screening and exhibited marked variation in their opinions on optimal intervals for screening and ages to start screening (Trigoni et al, 2011). Conflicting expert recommendations regarding breast cancer screening may result in diminished uptake of mammography over time (Han et al, 2007). Screening tests are advised at suboptimal rates (Kamposioras et al, 2008), inequalities in access to and use of specialized healthcare services are large (Athanasakis et al, in press), while waiting lists for diagnostic tests are long (Geitona & Kanavos, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%