2016
DOI: 10.26675/jabe.v2i1.6049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Akuntansi Keuangan Menengah 1 Antara Gaya Kognitif “Field Independent “ Dan “Field Dependent

Abstract: This research purpose to examine whether there is difference of intermediate accounting learning outcomes between "field independent" students and "field dependent" students . This study used survei approach. The population are from 288 accounting students with 167 samples. Instrument of student's cognitive style by GEFT. Student's academic achievement from accounting department's data. The results showed that there is differences on the students' intermediate accounting learning outcomes between "field indepe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the research conducted by Suryanti (2014), it was explained that the assessment using GEFT with values 0 -11 belonged to the Dependent (FD) field category and the 12-18 values belonged to the field independent (FI) category. The GEFT test results conducted on Nurul Hadi Islamic Vocational School students showed that students who had field-independent cognitive style (FI) were 47.5% (19 students) and students who had a field-dependent (FD) cognitive style of 52.5% (21 students).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the research conducted by Suryanti (2014), it was explained that the assessment using GEFT with values 0 -11 belonged to the Dependent (FD) field category and the 12-18 values belonged to the field independent (FI) category. The GEFT test results conducted on Nurul Hadi Islamic Vocational School students showed that students who had field-independent cognitive style (FI) were 47.5% (19 students) and students who had a field-dependent (FD) cognitive style of 52.5% (21 students).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument in this study consisted of a matter of GEFT (Group Embedded Figures Test). GEFT is a test where each individual is directed to look for a series of simple forms that are in a complex and larger form, designed in such a way as to include or hide these simple forms (Suryanti, 2014). This test consists of 3 parts, the first part consists of 7 questions which only function as exercises so that the results are not taken into account.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their perceptions are easily changed by the environment (Rusdi et al, 2020). Meanwhile, FI cognitive style has type of thinking analytically, tends to analyze an object based on context, organizing objects, impersonally oriented, prefer profession requiring individual capability and prioritizing internal motivation (Suryanti, 2014). Polya said the students with FI used the steps in problem solving, such as understanding the problem, planning, executing plans then reviewing processes and results (Kamandoko & Suherman, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%