2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peraluminous I-type granites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
0
15

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(86 reference statements)
4
85
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the compositional similarity between migmatitic leucosomes and crosscutting granites we believe that the granites are a result of in situ melting of mafic to intermediate igneous protoliths under specific melting conditions during crustal thickening as discussed for peraluminous I-type granites (cf. Chappell et al, 2012). A similar protolithdependent origin was already suggested for several magmatic post-collisional granite series in the Tien Shan .…”
Section: Nd Isotopic Compositions Of the Garm Rockssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the compositional similarity between migmatitic leucosomes and crosscutting granites we believe that the granites are a result of in situ melting of mafic to intermediate igneous protoliths under specific melting conditions during crustal thickening as discussed for peraluminous I-type granites (cf. Chappell et al, 2012). A similar protolithdependent origin was already suggested for several magmatic post-collisional granite series in the Tien Shan .…”
Section: Nd Isotopic Compositions Of the Garm Rockssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…5). They may be classified as peraluminous I-type granites similar to those described in the Lachlan Fold Belt representing an active continental magmatic arc environment (Chappell et al, 2012 and references therein).…”
Section: Geochemistry Of Granitoid Rocks In the Garm Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Early Jurassic intrusive rocks in the Helong area are dominated by granitoids, with only minor mafic–intermediate lithologies. It is possible for granitoid melts to be formed by fractional crystallization of basaltic magmas, but the volume problem works against this as a possible means for the production of widespread and volumetrically significant granitoids (Chappell, Bryant, & Wyborn, ; Zen, ). The high SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 and low MgO and TFe 2 O 3 concentrations of the Early Jurassic granitoids, together with their high‐K calc‐alkaline characteristics, LREE and LILE enrichment, and HREE and HFSE depletion (Figure c), suggest that these rocks were derived from parental magma generated by the partial melting of lower crustal material (Xu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue on the classification of the granitic rocks has been a hot topic for decades, and many types of granitic rocks are proposed based on the different standards, among which the classification of I-, S-, M-, and A-type granite are well accepted all over the world [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. The term of A-type granite was first proposed by [45] and defined by their alkaline, anhydrous and anorogenic nature.…”
Section: Genetic Type Of the Granitic Rocks: An A-type Affinitymentioning
confidence: 99%