2009
DOI: 10.5565/rev/catjl.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Per què Y? Sobre la centralitat de la sintaxi a l’arquitectura de la gramàtica

Abstract: I defend the centrality of the syntactic module within the general architecture of grammar. According to this model of the language faculty, syntax creates structures that are interpreted at the interfaces with the Articularory-Perceptual and Conceptual-Intentional systems. Thus, I show that the classic inverted-Y model of the architecture of grammar is better suited than alternative "parallel architectures" (cf. Jackendoff (1997 et seq.)) when accounting for interface phenomena. In order to do that, I discuss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Syntactic variation related to discourse-information structure is one particularly relevant example, and it presents one of the biggest challenges for the Y-model of language (e.g., Irurtzun 2009). Although no crosslinguistic model accounting for variability due to information structure currently exists in this framework, numerous attempts have centered on particular phenomena or languages.…”
Section: Gradience Across Generative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syntactic variation related to discourse-information structure is one particularly relevant example, and it presents one of the biggest challenges for the Y-model of language (e.g., Irurtzun 2009). Although no crosslinguistic model accounting for variability due to information structure currently exists in this framework, numerous attempts have centered on particular phenomena or languages.…”
Section: Gradience Across Generative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%