2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.725727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PepVAE: Variational Autoencoder Framework for Antimicrobial Peptide Generation and Activity Prediction

Abstract: New methods for antimicrobial design are critical for combating pathogenic bacteria in the post-antibiotic era. Fortunately, competition within complex communities has led to the natural evolution of antimicrobial peptide (AMP) sequences that have promising bactericidal properties. Unfortunately, the identification, characterization, and production of AMPs can prove complex and time consuming. Here, we report a peptide generation framework, PepVAE, based around variational autoencoder (VAE) and antimicrobial a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of modelling AMPs was undertaken by a number of different computational approaches. One group of these approaches are classifiers, which take a peptide as input and their task is to predict whether the peptide is an AMP or not [6, 7, 8, 9], whether it is toxic [10, 11], or whether it is active [12, 13]. A related group of methods are quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models [14, 15], which identify a set of structural features for a given peptide, all of which are associated with the peptides being AMP, for example helical structure, amphipathicity, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of modelling AMPs was undertaken by a number of different computational approaches. One group of these approaches are classifiers, which take a peptide as input and their task is to predict whether the peptide is an AMP or not [6, 7, 8, 9], whether it is toxic [10, 11], or whether it is active [12, 13]. A related group of methods are quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models [14, 15], which identify a set of structural features for a given peptide, all of which are associated with the peptides being AMP, for example helical structure, amphipathicity, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, rAMPage employs AMPlify as its AMP prediction step, and will continue to until it is surpassed in performance. Machine learning in AMP discovery is a dynamic study, ranging from AMP sequence prediction and structure classification to de novo AMP sequence generation and design [ 45 , 46 , 47 ]. While there are existing methods to mine protein databases [ 48 , 49 ], rAMPage is an all-in-one tool to mine next-generation sequencing data directly from reads to AMP prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used VAEs because they have previously been used for de novo AMP design 16,17,19,44 . The generative VAE consists of an encoder, a latent vector, and a decoder.…”
Section: Generator Variational Autoencoder (Vae)mentioning
confidence: 99%