Therapeutic Oligonucleotides 2008
DOI: 10.1039/9781847558275-00080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peptide–Peptide Nucleic Acid Conjugates for Modulation of Gene Expression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Covalent strategies have been mainly reported for the delivery of DNA mimic molecules or steric block oligonucleotides, including PNA (Koppelhus et al. , 2002; Fabani et al. , 2008), phosphorodiamidate morpholino‐oligomer (PMO) (Abes et al.…”
Section: Cell‐penetrating Peptide Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Covalent strategies have been mainly reported for the delivery of DNA mimic molecules or steric block oligonucleotides, including PNA (Koppelhus et al. , 2002; Fabani et al. , 2008), phosphorodiamidate morpholino‐oligomer (PMO) (Abes et al.…”
Section: Cell‐penetrating Peptide Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the stability and efficiency of the cargo, several parameters need to be considered including the type of linkage chemistry, the nature of the spacer ( Gait, 2003 ; Zatsepin et al , 2005 ). Covalent strategies have been mainly reported for the delivery of DNA mimic molecules or steric block oligonucleotides, including PNA ( Koppelhus et al , 2002 ; Fabani et al , 2008 ), phosphorodiamidate morpholino-oligomer (PMO) ( Abes et al , 2006 ; Lebleu et al , 2008 ; Moulton and Moulton, 2008 ), peptide and protein ( Snyder and Dowdy, 2005 ). Conjugation methods offer several advantages for in vivo applications including rationalization, reproducibility of the procedure, together with the control of the stoechiometry of the CPP-cargo.…”
Section: Cell-penetrating Peptide Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have chosen PNAs as our model cargo for four reasons: 1) Their size is easily tunable at constant LogD by adjusting the number of nucleobases, 2) They are cell membrane-impermeable on their own (when not linked to a cationic cell-penetrating peptide sequence or to pHLIP), 3) They can be easily labeled with a fluorophore, thereby allowing tracking of their cell delivery and in vivo biodistribution, and 4) They have therapeutic potential as modulators of gene expression. [28][29][30][31] Previously, pHLIP has been used to deliver PNAs that inhibit a microRNA 22 and a long-noncoding RNA 23 , respectively. Although sufficient delivery for a therapeutic effect was achieved in both studies, it is important to note that tumor targeting by either pHLIP-PNA conjugate was not actually demonstrated in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a key issue in use of ONs as therapeutics has been to achieve a sufficient level of intra-cellular delivery, especially in vivo for example within diseased muscle of DMD patients, such that the ON is in significant excess over the RNA target and remains so in order to achieve a high and sustained level of biological activity. Conjugation of the ON to a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) enhances significantly the activity of both PNA and PMO in cellular and animal models ( 15–19 ). In the case of PMO, an arginine-rich lead peptide has been proposed, (R-Ahx-R) 4 -Ahx-β-Ala (or RXR4XB), where Ahx (X) is aminohexanoyl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%