2016
DOI: 10.1116/1.4966266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peptide interactions with zigzag edges in graphene

Abstract: Recognition and manipulation of graphene edges enable the control of physical properties of graphene-based devices. Recently, the authors have identified a peptide that preferentially binds to graphene edges from a combinatorial peptide library. In this study, the authors examine the functional basis for the edge binding peptide using experimental and computational methods. The effect of amino acid substitution, sequence context, and solution pH value on the binding of the peptide to graphene has been investig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many of the more recent simulation studies of the peptide–materials biointerface involve the use of advanced conformational sampling. ,,,,, ,,,,, That said, we reiterate here that the use of advanced conformational sampling is a necessary, but not sufficient, factor in making physically reasonable predictions of abiotic/biotic interfacial interactions; the influences of the interfacial force field and the structural model of the substrate can also exert a critical influence on the simulation outcomes. For example, Sahai and co-workers reported the use of advanced conformational sampling (using parallel tempering metadynamics) to predict the adsorption free energies and structures of the aqueous peptide/hydroxyapatite (HAP) interface .…”
Section: Bioinspired Nanotechnologymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, many of the more recent simulation studies of the peptide–materials biointerface involve the use of advanced conformational sampling. ,,,,, ,,,,, That said, we reiterate here that the use of advanced conformational sampling is a necessary, but not sufficient, factor in making physically reasonable predictions of abiotic/biotic interfacial interactions; the influences of the interfacial force field and the structural model of the substrate can also exert a critical influence on the simulation outcomes. For example, Sahai and co-workers reported the use of advanced conformational sampling (using parallel tempering metadynamics) to predict the adsorption free energies and structures of the aqueous peptide/hydroxyapatite (HAP) interface .…”
Section: Bioinspired Nanotechnologymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Molecular dynamics simulation. We have further validated the experimentally determined adsorption free energy using the adaptive biasing force method (ABF) 33,35,36 . First, we constructed the potential mean force (PMF) profile as described in the methods section.…”
Section: Free Adsorption Energy From Mp-spr Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To obtain the initial configuration at each window, seven constraint molecular dynamics simulations were run to bring the peptide to each window center by imposing a harmonic force on the collective variable D. To obtain smooth free energy profile, each window was divided into 60 bins so that the bin size δD Y was 0.1 Å. Therefore, the free energy difference was reconstructed by 33,36 ΔA ¼ AðD b…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kuang et al found a peptide that tends to be adsorbed on the graphene edges because of having some specific residues. [ 24,36 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%