2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peptide inhibitor of Japanese encephalitis virus infection targeting envelope protein domain III

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that the ED3 domain of the virus envelope can inhibit entry of DENV, WNV, and JEV (32)(33)(34)(35). To test if the ED3 generated in our study could compete with JEV binding to cells (as measured by productive infection, leading to JEV RNA replication, and the virus yield), Neuro2a cells were incubated with JEV ED3 or JEV NS3 for 1 h on ice, followed by infection with JEV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the ED3 domain of the virus envelope can inhibit entry of DENV, WNV, and JEV (32)(33)(34)(35). To test if the ED3 generated in our study could compete with JEV binding to cells (as measured by productive infection, leading to JEV RNA replication, and the virus yield), Neuro2a cells were incubated with JEV ED3 or JEV NS3 for 1 h on ice, followed by infection with JEV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences may be explained by differential binding and entry efficiency of the viruses to the host cell. JEV interacts with its still unidentified host cell receptor via the viral envelope E protein [35]. Modifications of the E protein can alter JEV binding and penetration into the target cell [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These drugs inhibited JEV infection in vitro [123,124] and provided partial protection in vivo when they were intraperitoneally administered before JEV infection [125]. Similarly, a peptide known to bind the E protein inhibited JEV infection in vitro, probably by disrupting the interaction between the virion and cellular receptors [126]. Surfactant-modified nanoscale silicate platelets inhibited viral attachment by interacting electrostatically with the virus [127].…”
Section: Viral Replication Cycle-based Antiviral Drugsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[94,95] Minocycline Antioxidant [99,100] Arctigenin Antioxidant [101] Fenofibrate Antioxidant [102] Curcumin Antioxidant [103] Pentoxifylline Assembly or Release [105] Nitazoxanide Early/mid-replication cycle [107] Nucleic acid-based siRNA C, M, E, NS1, NS3, NS4B, NS5 [109][110][111][112][113][114][115] PNA UTR [119] Morpholino oligomer UTR [121,122] Virus replication cycle-based Heparan sulfate Receptor binding [123][124][125] E-binding peptide Receptor binding [126] NSQ Attachment [127] Indirubin Attachment [128] Bovine lactoferrin Receptor binding [129] Griffithsin Receptor binding [130] Recombinant E Receptor binding [131,132] MCPIP1 RNA replication [133] Kaempferol RNA replication [134] SCH16 Translation [138,139] In silico modeling-based Ivermectin NS3 [146] 4-hydroxypanduratin NS2B/NS3 [147] C randomized, double-blind, human clinical trial conducted in India [95]. A variety of virus-infected cells have been shown to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are associated with viral pathogenicity, for example, by inducing cellular apoptosis [96].…”
Section: Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%