2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PEPITA: A Design of Robot Pet Interface for Promoting Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More research is needed to assess how other types of behavioral feedback impact the training interaction and how to correctly implement that demeanor into current machine learning techniques. Notwithstanding, research with non-humanoid robots that communicate with nonverbal cues like light [55,56], sound [57,58] or both [37,59,60] is an ongoing area of study in the field of Social Robotics. The next step of this research aims to identify and design light cues and audio utterances that can improve the experience of training robots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More research is needed to assess how other types of behavioral feedback impact the training interaction and how to correctly implement that demeanor into current machine learning techniques. Notwithstanding, research with non-humanoid robots that communicate with nonverbal cues like light [55,56], sound [57,58] or both [37,59,60] is an ongoing area of study in the field of Social Robotics. The next step of this research aims to identify and design light cues and audio utterances that can improve the experience of training robots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second part of the questionnaire explored the modalities used by robots to convey affective expressions visually. We compared two categories: facial expressions using mechanical faces (Zeno [32] and Probo [31]) and facial expressions using a display (Buddy [11] and Pepita [58]). Considering we need video stimulus for these items, robots that fall in this category and that had video available to the public were selected.…”
Section: Questionnaire Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, methods for conveying the robot's affective expressions were evaluated. We compared robots that used mechanical facial expressions (Probo [31] and Zeno [32]) and two robots that used a display to manage the robot's facial expressions (Pepita [58] and Buddy [11]). The results showed that there was a significant difference between Pepita and the other three robots.…”
Section: Exploring the Design Of Pepitamentioning
confidence: 99%