People, Fields, and Strategies: Dissecting Political Institutions in the Tequila Valleys of Western Mexico

Beekman, Christopher S.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51437-2_23

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More recent work has attempted to avoid the typological trap. Beekman considers multiple fields (built spaces) where political leaders employed varying political strategies (some more individualized, others more group oriented) to attain distinct goals (Beekman, 2016a(Beekman, , 2020. He proposes that multiple lineages shared power and ruled over the several polities in the region.…”

Section: Political Institutionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Mesoamerica (Figure 1), Teotihuacan and Tlaxacallan in central Mexico (Fargher et al, 2011b;Manzanilla, 2015;Carballo, 2020), Monte Albán in Oaxaca (Joyce et al, 2001;Fargher, 2016;Feinman et al, 2021), the Gulf region (Stark, 2016), and the western reaches of this area (Heredia Espinoza, 2016Espinoza, , 2020Espinoza, , 2021Beekman, 2020), all offer cases that defy deeply-held notions of past sociopolitical structure. This article describes Teuchitlán in the Tequila region of Jalisco, Mexico (350 B.C.E.−450 C.E.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Collapse of a Collective Society: Teuchitlán in the Tequila Region of Jalisco, Mexico

Espinoza

2022

Front. Polit. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-cultural research on ancient societies demonstrates that collective social formations tend to experience a more sudden collapse with relatively catastrophic effects compared to formations low in collectivity. The demise of collective formations often involves more pronounced social unrest and a more complete disintegration of the agrarian and sociopolitical systems. This article further probes this general finding using the case of Teuchitlán, in the Tequila region of Jalisco, Mexico, which lasted for ~700 years, from 350 B.C.E. to about 450/500 C.E., when it suddenly disappeared. It was characterized by power-sharing among multiple groups whose leaders employed varied political strategies. Structurally, Teuchitlán aligns with some of the precepts of collective action and good government, as it was inwardly focused and placed great emphasis on the joint production of the polity's resources, especially agriculture, as well as the equitable distribution of benefits, such as community feasting and ritual, and some form of political participation or voice (e.g., power-sharing). Scholars working in the area have invoked various environmental factors, demographic movements, natural disasters, the collapse of central places, and a breakdown in trade connections, among others, as causes of Teuchitlán's disintegration—and the answer may indeed lie in a combination of these phenomena. This article explores the major shifts in the institutions that comprised Teuchitlán, thereby presenting an alternative view of its nature and disappearance. Settlement patterns, architectural differences, ceramic decoration and vessel forms, and lithic technology from the period following Teuchitlán's collapse suggest major changes in ideology, economy, and politics. The placement of large centers along trade routes, coupled with increased control of interregional exchange, indicates a shift toward direct, discretionary control of polity revenues by political leaders with little benefit for the populace. As part of these changes, the human landscape became more ruralized. Teuchitlán is comparable to other well-known cases in the world where more collective forms of political organization met a similar fate, such as Chaco Canyon (Southwest USA), Jenne-jeno (Mali), and the Indus Civilization.

show abstract

Section: Political Institutionsmentioning

confidence: 99%