“People as Technology” Conceptual Model: Toward a New Value Creation Paradigm for Strategic Human Resource Development

Hughes, Claretha

doi:10.1177/1534484309353561

Cited by 63 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another interesting and new concept that increases value creation for any company is created by C. Hughes (2010). She proposes a "people as technology" conceptual model.…”

Section: Value Added = Total Revenue -The Cost Of Expenditurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…-C. Hughes (2010) involves these components into model "People as technology" and incorporates them into the human resource development section (Fig. 2).…”

Section: Value Added = Total Revenue -The Cost Of Expenditurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many scientists emphasize the importance of company's value added as the main factor of a normal and stable every company's activity (Kay 1995;Berry 1996;Herling 2000;Malgioglio et al 2001;Zapata 2001;McLean 2006;Godoy 2008;Wang, Swanson 2008;Pitelis 2009;Bowman, Ambrosini 2010;Bang et al 2010;Díez et al 2010;Hughes 2010). Every company is trying to increase its value added as much as possible.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Company’s Value Added and Its Intellectual Capital Coherence

Mačerinskienė

Survilaitė

2011

Business: Theory and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

abstract. The importance of small and medium-sized business companies has always been indisputable. Governments are trying to facilitate the entrance into a marketplace; the activity itself and managers are able to administer their companies in their best manner. Despite these facts, the changing environment has made a strong impact on all companies all over the world. In addition to this, nowadays it is not enough just to have a sack of tangible assets in order to have huge company's value added. The modern century of new technologies, the importance of knowledge and information brought a new attitude to the company. The value added, which is created by the company, depends not only on tangible assets but also on intangible assets, which, by the way, are among the most important in a new modern company. Intellectual capital is intangible, hardly measurable, but plays a vital role in every company's value added. This paper is aimed at analysing this company's value added and its intellectual capital coherence, and the model of new company's value added and its intellectual capital coherence is proposed.Keywords: company's value added, intellectual capital, human capital, structural capital, customer capital, people as technology. 2010-11-18; priimta 2011-02-26 santrauka. Smulkiojo ir vidutinio verslo įmonių svarba visada buvo nenuginčijama. Vyriausybės stengiasi palengvinti šių įmonių įėjimą į rinką ir pačią jų veiklą, o vadovai stengiasi valdyti savo įmones pačiu efektyviausiu ir geriausiu būdu. Nepaisant šių pastangų, besikeičianti aplinka padarė didžiulę įtaką įmonėms visame pasaulyje. Taip pat šiais laikais jau neužtenka turėti "maišo materialaus turto", kad įmonės pridėtinė vertė būtų didelė. Modernus naujų technologijų amžius, žinių ir informacijos svarba suteikė naują požiūrį į įmonę. Pridėtinė vertė, sukurta įmonės, dabar jau priklauso ne tik nuo materialaus turto, bet ir nuo nematerialaus turto, ir nematerialių vertybių, kurios šiuolaikinei įmonei yra pačios svarbios. Intelektinis kapitalas yra nematerialus, neapčiuopiamas, sunkiai apskaičiuojamas, tačiau yra gyvybiškai svarbus kuriant įmonės pridėtinę vertę. Šiame straipsnyje ištirtas įmonės intelektinis kapitalas ir jos pridėtinės vertės sąsaja, pristatytas įmonės intelektinis kapitalas ir pridė-tinės vertės modelis.reikšminiai žodžiai: įmonės pridėtinė vertė, intelektinis kapitalas, žmogiškasis kapitalas, struktūrinis kapitalas, klientų kapitalas, žmonės kaip technologija.

show abstract

“…Another interesting and new concept that increases value creation for any company is created by C. Hughes (2010). She proposes a "people as technology" conceptual model.…”

Section: Value Added = Total Revenue -The Cost Of Expenditurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…-C. Hughes (2010) involves these components into model "People as technology" and incorporates them into the human resource development section (Fig. 2).…”

Section: Value Added = Total Revenue -The Cost Of Expenditurementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Company’s Value Added and Its Intellectual Capital Coherence

Mačerinskienė

Survilaitė

2011

Business: Theory and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many authors (Bang et al 2010;Bowman, Ambrosini 2010;Díez et al 2010;Godoy 2008;Hughes 2010;Malgioglio et al 2001;McLean 2006;Pitelis 2009;Wang, Swanson 2008;Zapata 2001) are accentuating the importance of human capital for the successful activities of private or public sector organisations and profit and nonprofit organisations. Although the importance of human capital is indisputable, the benefits are not clearly visible, but the importance of human capital is obvious, when it is non-existent.…”

Section: The Interface Between Innovations and Human Capitalmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Human Capital for National Innovation Capability in Eu Countries

Aleknavičiūtė

Skvarciany

Survilaitė

2016

Economics and Culture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Innovation is essential for economic growth in developed countries. One of the most important sources of innovation is human capital. In this article, state of human capital in EU countries is investigated in order to show the relationship between human capital and national innovation performance. In the first part, theoretical assumptions of human capital importance for innovation processes are analysed. Secondly, measures of human capital are analysed and a measurement model is presented. This model is applied for investigation of state of human capital in 26 EU countries during 2002-2012. Results showed that quality of human capital is the most important factor for innovation performance. Quality indicators have even higher correlation with innovation in countries with low share of innovative enterprises (enterprises with high-level of new technology acceptance and usage). The aim of research is to analyse the theoretical importance of human capital investment for national innovation capability in EU countries, and to determine human capital aspects that foster innovation performance. Therefore, objectives are as follows: to analyse theoretical assumptions of human capital importance for innovation processes and to present the current state of research; to analyse available human capital measures and create a human capital measurement model; and to analyse state of human capital in EU countries as well as its relationship with national innovation capability.

show abstract

“…That is why a well known definition of intellectual capital has not been found yet. Scientists, who investigated the theory of intellectual capital (Edvinsson and Malone (1997b), Thomas A. Stewart (1997b), Bontis (1998aBontis ( , 1999, Bueno Campos (1998b), Dave Ulrich (1998b), Calvo et al (1999b), Hughes (2010), Soler and Celestino (2007b), Sanchez (2007b), Zéghal and Maaloul (2010b), Diez et al (2010b)), mainly emphasize knowledge, skills, motivation, experience, positivity of employees, education, routines, structures in a company as the main factors of intellectual capital. Usually intellectual capital is identified with human capital and human knowledge, but the definition should be broader.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%