Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara Sebagai Salah Satu Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Puspitasari, Sri Hastuti

doi:10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss3.art4

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

Section: Kewenangan Legislasi Pasca Amandemen Uud 1945unclassified

The Legislative Power of the House of Representatives after the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Musana

2020

Constitutionale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The legislative power after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945) resulted in a shift in legislative authority from the President to the House of Representatives (DPR). The legislative authority after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution predominantly rests with the DPR, however, the President and the Regional Representatives Council are also given the authority to form laws. The powers that be in the DPR do not necessarily make the DPR superior to the President and DPD in terms of legislation. It turns out that the strengthening of the legislative power that is in the DPR as a legislative body cannot prove that the resulting regulations are commensurate with the increased authority obtained after the amendments to the 1945 Constitution. In fact, regulations originating from the President and DPD as executive bodies appear to be more active than those that originate. from the DPR. This study aims to thoroughly analyze and map the legislative power of the DPR as well as the legislative power possessed by the President and DPD because after the amendment the three state institutions have legislative powers, if this happens it will have the potential to reduce the legislative power possessed by the DPR. The type of research used is a type of normative research with a Normative-Analytical approach that uses secondary data sources with primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials.

show abstract

Section: Kewenangan Legislasi Pasca Amandemen Uud 1945unclassified

The Legislative Power of the House of Representatives after the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Musana

2020

Constitutionale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tidak berhenti pada lembaga Presiden dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, dalam perubahan amandemen ini melahirkaan lembaga baru yang ikut andil dalam kewenangan legislasi yaitu Dewan Perwakilan Daerah. 23 Secara spesifik kewenangan legislasi terdapat pada amandemen pertama, amandemen kedua, dan amandemen ketiga. Amandemen Ketiga  Pasal 22D ayat (1): Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dapat mengajukan kepada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat rancangan undang-undang yang berkaitan dengan otonomi daerah, hubungan pusat dan daerah, pembentukan dan pemekaran serta penggabungan daerah, pengelolaan sumber daya alam dan sumber daya ekonomi lainnya, serta yang berkaitan dengan perimbangan keuangan pusat dan daerah.…”

Section: Kewenangan Legislasi Pasca Amandemen Uud 1945unclassified

Untitled

2020

Constitutionale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Dalam hal ini, dibentuklah Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai salah satu pelaksana Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia setelah disahkannya Perubahan Ketiga UUD 1945. Dengan terbentuknya lembaga ini, formation of this institution, Indonesia is positioned as the 78th country worldwide that has formed a Constitutional Court (Puspitasari, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

The Independence and Accountability of the Constitutional Court in the Constitutional System in Indonesia

Rezah

Sapada

2023

sjh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to examine and analyze the independence and accountability of the Constitutional Court in the constitutional system in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach. The collection of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials is carried out using literature study techniques. The collected legal material is analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods to describe the problem and answer study purposes. The results show that the Constitutional Court acts as the interpreter and guardian of the constitution. In addition, the Constitutional Court also acts as a guardian of human rights, citizens’ constitutional rights, and democracy. Furthermore, independence and accountability in a judicial process are like two sides of a coin. These cannot be separated because the two principles complement each other. Although the Constitutional Court has implemented duties and functions based on the principle of accountability. However, the independence of the Constitutional Court as the executor of Judicial Power has finally been lost. The Constitutional Court is now a judicial institution whose position is limited to sub-ordination from the other spheres of State Power which proposes Judges to fill in the Constitutional Court. Therefore, it is recommended that Constitutional Judges maintain their independence even though their positions result from proposals by other spheres of State Power. It is also recommended that the President and the House of Representatives uphold the mechanism of checks and balances between spheres of state power based on democratic principles. In this case, to realize the ideals of a law-based and democratic-based state for the sake of a more recognized national and state life.

show abstract

Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara Sebagai Salah Satu Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

The Legislative Power of the House of Representatives after the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

The Legislative Power of the House of Representatives after the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Untitled

The Independence and Accountability of the Constitutional Court in the Constitutional System in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About