“…In contrast, the latter type of religious agency crosses the boundaries of religious congregations to which women belong and involves religious switching, that is, a permanent change of religious membership, as well as interactions with other churches that do not entail a formal change of affiliation. Whereas both types of religious agency are usually seen as expressions of religious preferences and religiosity (e.g., Hadaway and Marler ; Kalu ; Loveland ; Sherkat and Wilson ), following the reviewed literature on religion and women's empowerment, we can also construe them as proxies for women's ability to use religion to pursue goals that transcend the religious domain and project on other aspects of women's experiences and relationships. In this sense, women's religious agency is not a sign of compliance with religion‐rooted patriarchal norms, but rather a channel and a tool to formulate choices and make decisions on their own, even when these decisions seemingly contradict specific religious teachings, such as, for example, religious proscriptions on birth control (see, e.g., Agadjanian ).…”