2006
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200600173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl–Ruthenium Catalysts for Regio‐ and Enantioselective Allylation of Nucleophiles

Abstract: Ruthenium(II) complexes containing the pentamethylcyclopentadienyl ligand efficiently perform the activation of allylic carbonates and halides to generate cationic and dicationic ruthenium(IV) complexes. This activation has been transferred as a key step to the catalytic allylation of nucleophiles. The structural and electronic properties of the allylic moieties lead to the regioselective formation of chiral products resulting from nucleophilic addition to their most substituted terminus. The catalytic activit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2] Furthermore, the substitution of one or two acetonitrile ligands in the cationic complex 1a by various nitrogen [3] or phosphorus [4] ligands (Scheme 1) has led to a family of precatalysts allowing one to extend the scope of the catalytic process and to enhance reactivity. [5] Thus, the regioselective formation of branched derivatives from aromatic cinnamyl-type linear substrates is almost perfect in several reactions involving carbon-carbon, oxygen-carbon, and nitrogen-carbon bond formation. However, the regioselectivity remained unsatisfactory starting from unsymmetrical aliphatic allylic substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2] Furthermore, the substitution of one or two acetonitrile ligands in the cationic complex 1a by various nitrogen [3] or phosphorus [4] ligands (Scheme 1) has led to a family of precatalysts allowing one to extend the scope of the catalytic process and to enhance reactivity. [5] Thus, the regioselective formation of branched derivatives from aromatic cinnamyl-type linear substrates is almost perfect in several reactions involving carbon-carbon, oxygen-carbon, and nitrogen-carbon bond formation. However, the regioselectivity remained unsatisfactory starting from unsymmetrical aliphatic allylic substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the discovery of the catalytic activity of the [RuA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (C 5 Me 5 )(1,5-cyclooctadiene)Cl] complex in nucleophilic allylic substitution, [1] the precatalyst [RuA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (C 5 Me 5 6 ], 1a, has attracted the most interest as it provided higher regioselectivities in favor of the chiral branched products. [2] Furthermore, the substitution of one or two acetonitrile ligands in the cationic complex 1a by various nitrogen [3] or phosphorus [4] ligands (Scheme 1) has led to a family of precatalysts allowing one to extend the scope of the catalytic process and to enhance reactivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of transition metal catalysts to facilitate the allylation of a variety of organic nucleophiles now represents an established methodology with examples from Pd, [1] Ir, [2] Cu [3] and Ru [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] chemistry all well documented [see Eq. (1)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10] Furthermore, additives, such as a base, in stoichiometric quantities are often necessary in order to generate an anionic nucleophile to ensure that the chemistry proceeds in good yield. [11][12][13][14] Even under such conditions, the reactions are often observed to be relatively slow, requiring 10-20 h [7,15a] and/or increased reaction temperatures [11,12] to go to completion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, several ruthenium derivatives have proven to be largely effective for the introduction of nucleophiles at the more substituted position leading to branched (b) rather than linear (l) products (eq. 1) and Cp*Ru derivatives in particular [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%