2001
DOI: 10.1080/00335630109384319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pentadic cartography: Mapping the universe of discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…171-182 for a review), pentadic cartography moves beyond an anatomical analysis to turn to an ecological analysis. Anderson and Prelli (2001) write, ''Burke's dramatistic pentad furnishes a method for charting the ways that terminologies function to open or close the universe of discourse. This use of Burke's pentad to map verbal terrain we call 'pentadic cartography''' (p. 74).…”
Section: Pentadic Cartographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…171-182 for a review), pentadic cartography moves beyond an anatomical analysis to turn to an ecological analysis. Anderson and Prelli (2001) write, ''Burke's dramatistic pentad furnishes a method for charting the ways that terminologies function to open or close the universe of discourse. This use of Burke's pentad to map verbal terrain we call 'pentadic cartography''' (p. 74).…”
Section: Pentadic Cartographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pentadic map allows us to trace these terminologies. Anderson and Prelli (2001) present five steps by which the critic develops one's rhetorical cartography. First, the critic deploys the pentad ''as a cartographic device for mapping the universe of discourse, charting the terminological network of often implicit assumptions and relationship that serve to close or open discursive interactions'' (p. 80).…”
Section: Pentadic Cartographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analysed two speeches and their press coverage from Spain to explore these research questions and provide an answer to them. Drawing on literature which takes Burke's pentad as a cartographic device for mapping the universe of discourse (Anderson & Althouse, 2010;Anderson & Prelli 2001;Cragan & Shields, 1995;Birdsell, 1987) and on studies which qualitatively analyze four dimensions of frames (Entman, 2003(Entman, , 2004(Entman, and 2012 quote just a few) we elaborated a framework which allows, first, to map the speeches according to the pentad and the ratio; second, to identify the four dimensions of news frames; and finally, it enables to contrast the speeches with the coverage to ultimately explore the dynamics of the frames contest (see Figure 1). A code book was elaborated and applied to the front and inside pages and the op-ed pieces of each newspaper for our analysis.…”
Section: Research Question and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a key aspect of pentadic analysis, the scene offers the rationale for why and how discussants adopt and reject different frames as they engage in various wrangles. The pentadic ratio is thus a tool which helps mapping the discourse and the motives which are behind (Anderson & Prelli, 2001;Anderson & Althouse, 2010;McClure & Swar, 2015).…”
Section: Assessing Quality Of Motivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pentad, recalcitrance, and perspective by incongruity are useful critical concepts for identifying, differentiating, and analyzing perspectives adduced to create or respond to specific problems. The pentad enables mapping of distinct terminological starting points and their extensions to encompass a situation's meanings (Anderson & Prelli, 2001). There are instructive exemplars of pentadic mapping and its use to identify and question perspectives that have come to dominate discourse in terms of purportedly "settled" medical science or related established policy (Beck, 2006;Meisenbach, Remke, Buzzanell, & Liu, 2008), but more studies that explore the prospects and possibilities of this approach in RSSTM are needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%