Penile Prosthesis First and Replacement Surgeries: Analysis of Patient and Partner Satisfaction

Abstract

Introduction Among the many treatments for erectile dysfunction, implantation of a penile prosthesis has been associated with high patient satisfaction rates. Prosthesis replacement has become an accepted procedure in the event of device malfunction or complications, but to our knowledge, there are no data regarding the impact of implant replacement on patients and partner satisfaction. Aim The aim of our study was to assess and to compare the level of satisfaction, with a first or second penile prosthesis implantation (PPI), in men with refractory erectile dysfunction and their partners. Methods A survey study based on a five-item questionnaire was carried out at our center between January 1999 and January 2012. Main outcome measures The main outcome measure used was the level of patient and partner satisfaction with sexual intercourse after PPI. Results Of the 190 eligible patients, 149 (78%) completed the survey (110 underwent a first implant and 39 a reimplant). Seventy-nine percent of first-time implanted patients and 80% of the reimplanted patients (P > 0.05; not significant [ns]) reported satisfactory sexual intercourse (very or moderately satisfied), while 74% and 80% of their partners reported satisfactory intercourses, respectively (P > 0.05; ns). Overall, 73.7% of first implants and 70% of second implants reported that they would undergo the procedure again if the PPI failed (P > 0.05; ns). With regards to cosmetic aspects, 13% of the first implants' and 15% of second implants' partners reported either penile shortness or soft glans as the main causes of their dissatisfaction. Only 2.4% of first implants and 1% of reimplanted patients expressed difficulty in manipulating the device. Conclusions PPI is successful in returning the ability for satisfactory sexual intercourse to both first implant and reimplanted patients and their respective partners.

Defining a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level that predicts increased risk of penile implant infection

“…Grewal et al surveyed patients discharge and re‐visit data in a contemporary series of penile implant surgeries and found that infectious complications were the most common reason for reoperation. Whilst Lledó‐García et al reported high patient and partner satisfaction after both primary and replacement surgery. Reoperation is an undesirable event as it is associated not only with added morbidity but also with inferior results, including reduced implant survival.…”

The Rear Tip Extender for Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Introduction of “Rigidity Factor” and Review of the Literature

“…The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) has become the standard of care for severe erectile dysfunction refractory to non-surgical therapies. IPP placement is a reliable, safe surgical treatment option with high patient satisfaction rates [1][2][3]. The use of Rear Tip Extenders (RTEs) is an underexplored aspect of IPP placement.…”

Rear Tip Extenders and Penile Prosthesis Rigidity: A Laboratory Study of Coloplast Prostheses

“…The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) has evolved over the past four decades and become a reliable, safe surgical treatment option with high patient satisfaction rates [1–3]. Rear Tip Extenders (RTEs) were introduced in 1981 [4], in an effort to decrease input wear on the cylinders.…”