Penile necrosis induced by rubber bands – Case report

Pandher, Karan; Stubbee, Reid; Peta, Akhil; J, Sylora

doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101372

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Objects that cause penile constriction can be classified into hard materials, such as metal rings and plastic bottles, and soft materials such as rubber bands, threads, and strings 1 , 3 , 4 . The removal of soft constraining objects often requires more time, and a higher incidence of serious complications is observed, including necrosis 5 , 6 . This is attributed to their smaller surface area of constriction, intense pressure due to contraction, and often delayed identification and extended duration of constriction, as they can become embedded in the tissue.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovative techniques in the treatment of penile strangulation: a case report

Gazzah,

Mzoughi,

Lahouar

et al. 2024

Annals of Medicine &Amp; Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction and importance: Penile strangulation is a medical emergency characterized by the encirclement of the penis by an external object, resulting in circulatory compromise. Case presentation: A 35-year-old male presented with penile pain and urinary obstruction due to the inability to remove the ring. Upon examination, the ring was firmly lodged at the base of the penis, causing significant swelling and discoloration in the distal region. Interventions and outcomes: Initial attempts to cut the ring using standard tools were unsuccessful, leading to the engagement of a rescue team equipped with an air cutter. The cutting procedure, complicated by the ring’s thickness and hardness and the significant edema, took ~90 min. Safety measures, including the use of a surgical brain spatula and forceps, were employed to protect the penile skin from damage during the operation. Relevance and impact: This case underscores the necessity for timely intervention in penile strangulation cases and highlights the effectiveness of collaboration with specialized rescue teams equipped with appropriate cutting tools. It also emphasizes the importance of safety considerations when employing nonmedical devices in medical emergencies. The patient experienced a favorable outcome, with significant improvement in swelling and discoloration postprocedure, and no complications during follow-up. This report contributes to the limited but crucial literature on managing penile strangulation, particularly regarding the methods and timeframes for safely removing constricting objects.

show abstract