Pengungkapan Inovasi Disruptif Industri Perbankan Indonesia

Abstract

Voluntary disclosure is corporate communication to the broader public than disclosures required by capital market regulations. The disclosure of information is beneficial as a consideration in making decisions. The Disruptive innovation disclosure is a voluntary disclosure that provides information about the state of extraordinary innovation in the company. Disruptive innovation is used to describe revolutionary innovations and not evolutionary innovations (Thomond and Lettice, 2002). Outstanding innovation to expand, develop new markets and provide new functions, affecting existing market relationships. This research is critical to know the company's adaptive capacity, going concern, sustainability, and value creation. This study examines whether financial capital, human capital, and organizational capital affect the disruptive innovation disclosure. This quantitative study uses data from banking financial services companies listed on the IDX from 2015 to 2019. There are 205 data observations observed—processing and data analysis using OLS regression. Additional analysis performed was the ANOVA difference test. The results showed that the level of disruptive innovation disclosure was 30.96%. The disclosure story is low and means that adaptive and innovative power is critical in the highly competitive banking industry. Financial capital, human capital and organizational capital have a significant positive effect on the disruptive innovation disclosure.

The Effect of Industrial Type, Environmental Performance and Leverage on Carbon Emission Disclosure: Evidence from Indonesian LQ45 Companies

“…2.9.2. The effect of leverage on carbon emission disclosure Management of companies with a high level of leverage will reduce the disclosure of environmental responsibility related to carbon emissions so that they are not in the spotlight for debtholders (Suhardjanto and Choiriyah, 2010). Companies with high leverage will focus more on paying off their obligations than voluntary disclosures (Jensen & Meckling, 1976).…”

Determinant of Reputation Risk Management in Islamic Banks in Indonesia

“…In the case of Indonesia, several incidents that were expected to cause a decline in the reputation of the bank have occurred several times. (Suhardjanto & Dewi, 2011) mention several cases that reflect the poor management of the bank's business. These cases included the case of Bank Summa in 1992, the double financial reports carried out by Lippo Bank in 2002, the BNI bank fictional L / C cases in 2002, the closure of Global Bank in 2004 and the 2008 Century Bank case.…”