2023
DOI: 10.33395/owner.v7i3.1462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pengaruh Moral Sensitivity, Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Dalam Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa

Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of moral sensitivity, transparency and accountability on fraud prevention in managing village fund allocations in the Masamba District, South Sulawesi. The method used in this research is quantitative. The population of this study were all village officials in Masamba sub-district, Luwu-north district, South Sulawesi province. The sample for this study were 116 village officials, obtained using a non-probability sampling technique, namely saturated sampling. While data a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies related to transparency and potential corruption have been conducted previously. Research findings show that transparency can reduce the potential for corruption (Jimenez & Albalate, 2018;Aulia et al, 2023; Listivaniputri & Yuhertiana, 2022) [20,21,22] . However, research conducted by Kini et al (2021) [23] and Priatnasari & Suhardjanto (2020) [15] produced different conclusions, namely that transparency does not affect the frequency of fraud or corruption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies related to transparency and potential corruption have been conducted previously. Research findings show that transparency can reduce the potential for corruption (Jimenez & Albalate, 2018;Aulia et al, 2023; Listivaniputri & Yuhertiana, 2022) [20,21,22] . However, research conducted by Kini et al (2021) [23] and Priatnasari & Suhardjanto (2020) [15] produced different conclusions, namely that transparency does not affect the frequency of fraud or corruption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%