Pengalaman Pelajar (LX) Pelbagai Peringkat Umur Terhadap Penggunaan Teknologi Tutor Hologram

Abstract

Teknologi hologram kini semakin banyak digunakan dalam pelbagai bidang termasuk bidang pendidikan. Penggunaan hologram dilihat sangat berpotensi untuk dijadikan sebagai perwakilan tenaga pengajar sebenar di dalam kelas. Penggunaan tutor hologram juga dikatakan mampu menarik minat serta meningkatkan motivasi pelajar terhadap proses pembelajaran. Dengan pelbagai kelebihan yang ditawarkan, aspek pengalaman pelajar (LX) terhadap penggunaan tutor hologram ini tetap menjadi persoalan. Terutamanya, dari sudut pengalaman dan penerimaan pelajar dari pelbagai peringkat umur. Hal ini kerana, pengalaman dan penerimaan seseorang terhadap sesuatu teknologi baharu dilihat berbeza berdasarkan umur mereka. Sehubungan itu, kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan tutor hologram karakter manusia sebenar serta melihat kesannya terhadap pengalaman pelajar (LX) yang terdiri dari pelbagai peringkat umur. Secara khusus, responden bagi kajian ini terdiri daripada empat kumpulan yang berbeza peringkat umur yang dipilih dari sekolah rendah hingga ke peringkat tertiari. Soal selidik User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) telah digunakan untuk mendapatkan maklum balas pelajar sebaik selesai sesi pembelajaran dengan tutor hologram. Secara kesimpulan, terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan bagi pengalaman pelajar (LX) pelbagai kategori umur terhadap tutor hologram karakter manusia sebenar. Namun, skor min pengalaman pelajar (LX) tetap berada pada tahap yang positif dan neutral bagi setiap kumpulan.

The Development of Tracking Systems in Mobile Application for Trail Run

“…The objective research methodology utilized in this study is testing the usability and acceptance of this mobile application, research using the user experience questionnaire (UEQ) developed by (Schrepp, 2015). In this research, questionnaire are an easy method for collecting this kind of user feedback (Ali & Ramlie, 2021;Ramlie et al, 2022;Ramlie et al, 2020). They can be communicated quite effectively to larger user groups, especially if they are made into online surveys.…”

“…The responses are graded from -3 (completely disagree with the phrase) to +3 (completely agree with the term). The majority of the things begin with a positive term, while the others begin with a negative term (in randomized order) (Ramlie et al, 2022).…”

A Conceptual Framework for 3D Hologram Talking-Head Character Design

“…realistic a real human character design as a pedagogical agent character should be avoided to prevent uncomfortable feelings [12], it also can have a positive comforting effect when used as characters in animated videos [14]. The use of realistic real-human characters as hologram tutors is also said to have the potential to have a positive acceptance and experience effect on users, according to research findings [9].…”

“…With the term -hologram tutor,‖ educators are currently represented in the classroom by holograms [6]. Typically, the primary display for these hologram educators is a real human character [5,[7][8][9]. According to research on the use of character design in video games [10,11] and pedagogical agents [12,13], the use of different levels of realistic character design can influence different levels of user comfort and emotions.…”

“…The study on the use of this hologram tutor, on the other hand, displays the design of the entirely human character in actual size, which is a realistic display of human design from head to toe. Even though acceptance and emotional impact on the user is seen to be positive [9], the way it is handled limits the use of hologram tutors in specific situations. Since the hologram tutor is designed to be the size of a real person, the hologram platform that must be prepared is also larger and more difficult to manage.…”