2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetration resistance as affected by shallow-cut land leveling and cropping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many benefits are associated with the land leveling practice (Ramos et al, 2007); however, studies have also pointed to some disadvantages due to severe soil disturbance, indicating that there is some controversy regarding the positive and negative effects of leveling (Walker et al, 2003;Brye et al, 2005;Cay & Cattle, 2005). Therefore, new studies are necessary to investigate the subject, establishing parameters that may help farmers when planning land leveling, in the sense of foreseeing changes that will occur in the area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many benefits are associated with the land leveling practice (Ramos et al, 2007); however, studies have also pointed to some disadvantages due to severe soil disturbance, indicating that there is some controversy regarding the positive and negative effects of leveling (Walker et al, 2003;Brye et al, 2005;Cay & Cattle, 2005). Therefore, new studies are necessary to investigate the subject, establishing parameters that may help farmers when planning land leveling, in the sense of foreseeing changes that will occur in the area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates the formation of a layer characterized by reduced porosity at the soil surface, probably due to land leveling or to the effects of the previous rice-growing season. Land levelling can disrupt the surface soil of rice fields to the point that it could be considered structureless (Brye et al 2005). After the growing season (November 3, 2005), θ s and a values of the surface soil (5-10 cm) were decreased, in comparison with those determined before the growing season (May 4, 2005) ( Table 2).…”
Section: Van Genuchten Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Johnson et al (1978) showed that the average yield of the precision leveled fields is significantly more than the yield for traditional leveled. In addition, the mean time to irrigate a hectare field is significantly less for precision leveled than the traditional leveled [4]. The land leveling causes differences in soil depth and in soil layer characteristics along and across the plot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%