2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0sm01945c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetration and preferential binding of charged nanoparticles to mixed lipid monolayers: interplay of lipid packing and charge density

Abstract: Designing of nanoparticles (NPs) for biomedical applications or mitigating their cytotoxic effects requires microscopic understanding of their interactions with cell membranes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be ascribed to the lowest surface charge density of O1G1 among all the cases, evident from the highest mean molecular area value of its corresponding monolayer at 32 mN/m. The charge density of DPPG domains in two-component mixed floating lipid monolayers with similar compositions to those used in this work has recently been quantified by our group in a separate work, 67 which also reveals the lowest charge density of the DPPG phase in DOPC/DPPG-based membranes.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This can be ascribed to the lowest surface charge density of O1G1 among all the cases, evident from the highest mean molecular area value of its corresponding monolayer at 32 mN/m. The charge density of DPPG domains in two-component mixed floating lipid monolayers with similar compositions to those used in this work has recently been quantified by our group in a separate work, 67 which also reveals the lowest charge density of the DPPG phase in DOPC/DPPG-based membranes.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although the presence of buffer with salt can considerably screen the electrostatic interactions and the high zeta potential of the CQDs, the estimated Debye screening length of ∼0.8 nm (ref. 57) for the buffer used and the high charge density of the lipid membranes 43 suggest that the effective interaction strength would still be significant. Providing an exact quantification of the interaction energy between the QDs and the membrane as well as between the respective QDs would be challenging 13 given the complex geometry of the QDs and is outside the scope of this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DPPC:DPPG-based 2-component membranes have a higher charge density than the membranes having a fluidic component in lieu of DPPC. 43 An earlier theoretical study of oppositely charged proteins with a mixed lipid membrane having charged/uncharged lipids revealed that the protein coverage as well as the free adsorption energy is higher when the adsorbate molecules bind onto a more densely charged membrane. 69 Thus, the higher charge density of P1G1 not only leads to a higher adsorbed concentration of QDs on P1G1 but also a stronger binding affinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, any dysfunction on the LS mechanical properties or modification of its composition may be harmful for health [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. However, to date there is an important lack of knowledge about the true impact of inhaled particles in the respiratory cycle, even though it is clear that the deposition of particles on LS alters the breathing mechanics, the use of particles, even inhaled ones, in therapy and diagnosis is undergoing continuous growth [39][40][41][42][43]. Therefore, it is necessary to deepen the current understanding of the interactions of different types of particulate pollutants with LS for predicting their potential toxicity [44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%