1972
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/5/1/308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetration and energy-loss theory of electrons in solid targets

Abstract: Starting from a simple atomic model giving the potential between electrons and atoms as V(r) = Ze 2 a s−1/sr s with the empirical value s=fraction six-fifths, we combine the diffusion effect due to multiple collisions and the energy retardation in accordance with a modified Thomson-Whiddington law, with the scattering cross section in the Lenard absorption law. On this basis, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
563
0
8

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,288 publications
(590 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
19
563
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that the first crossover energy (where the SEY increases above 1) is strongly dependent on the surface properties whereas the energy at maximum yield is entirely controlled by bulk properties [29]. The escape depth for the true secondary is about 50 nm [30], so in order to decrease the SEY of an existing material using any of these parameters becomes a very difficult task and it has only been achieved by coating with a low SEY material [31]. The alternative method to lower the SEY is to trap the secondary emitted electron via the surface geometry such as high aspect ratio grooves [32] and surfaces covered by thin films [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the first crossover energy (where the SEY increases above 1) is strongly dependent on the surface properties whereas the energy at maximum yield is entirely controlled by bulk properties [29]. The escape depth for the true secondary is about 50 nm [30], so in order to decrease the SEY of an existing material using any of these parameters becomes a very difficult task and it has only been achieved by coating with a low SEY material [31]. The alternative method to lower the SEY is to trap the secondary emitted electron via the surface geometry such as high aspect ratio grooves [32] and surfaces covered by thin films [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value varies between 2 ms and 5 ms for JET runaway disruptions (figure 5). The penetration depth in Be and C is 2.5 mm and 2.0 mm, respectively [18]. The penetration in W is 0.15 mm.…”
Section: Runaway Dynamics and Wall Interactionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Cathodoluminescence (CL) measurements were performed at 34 K on a single CMS NW with an acceleration voltage of 7 kV. Based on the calculation by Kanaya et al, 19) the penetration depth of the electrons was about 500 nm under this condition, whereas most of the electrons were generated within a fraction of the penetration depth. 2(f), the aluminum and gallium compositions in the barrier layers were almost the same excluding the effect of indium diffusion, which is equal to the supply ratio of TMAl and TMGa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%