1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(97)80342-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetration ability of different irrigants into dentinal tubules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
166
0
15

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
166
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…21,22 A previous study showed that some canal irrigants could penetrate up to 130 µm from the canal lumen and eliminate bacteria. 23 However, heavy bacterial infection inside dentinal tubules may be present at depths of 400 µm. 24 For this reason, the present study evaluated reduction in dentin microhardness at 100 µm and 500 µm from the canal lumen, similarly to the study of Saghiri et al 12 Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 A previous study showed that some canal irrigants could penetrate up to 130 µm from the canal lumen and eliminate bacteria. 23 However, heavy bacterial infection inside dentinal tubules may be present at depths of 400 µm. 24 For this reason, the present study evaluated reduction in dentin microhardness at 100 µm and 500 µm from the canal lumen, similarly to the study of Saghiri et al 12 Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacteria with their by-products and necrotic debris in smear layers compromise the disinfection process (5) and decrease dentin permeability, hampering the diffusion of antimicrobial agents like irrigants into root dentin (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDTA has been suggested and widely used as an irrigation solution because it chelates calcium ions and removes the mineralized portion of smear layers (5,6,8). Although EDTA has a long history as an endodontic chelating agent, it has limited or no antibacterial activity (10) and a high surface tension value (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although various fungi, viruses, archaea contribute to the microbial diversity in endodontic infections, but the most common micro organism occurring in these infections are bacteria's [1]. Some microorganisms are resistant to antimicrobial treatment, it includes various Gram negative anaerobic rods such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella species and gram positive bacterias such as Streptococcus gordonii, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces species, etc [2]. The Microbial infection produce by these organisms plays an important role in the development of necrosis in dental pulp and leading to the formation of periapical lesions [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%