2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2005.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetrating standard line broadening impact theory for hydrogen-like ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect softens the interaction and makes perturbative treatments valid for a larger part of the phase space, resulting in a much reduced strong collision term and relatively small (practically no for the present work) difference in the CONVPST calculations with and without the strong collision term. As a result for hydrogen and H-like lines, this effect can be accounted for analytically and this has been done for the dipole part of the interaction [2,9,10]. It is therefore probably not a coincidence that agreement between CONVPST and DWE is very good for all lines in the series.…”
Section: The Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect softens the interaction and makes perturbative treatments valid for a larger part of the phase space, resulting in a much reduced strong collision term and relatively small (practically no for the present work) difference in the CONVPST calculations with and without the strong collision term. As a result for hydrogen and H-like lines, this effect can be accounted for analytically and this has been done for the dipole part of the interaction [2,9,10]. It is therefore probably not a coincidence that agreement between CONVPST and DWE is very good for all lines in the series.…”
Section: The Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for each ST and PST [9,10] calculations, runs were contributed with or without account of strong collisions. In CONVST, strong are collisions with impact parameters that are either smaller than n 2 a 0 or violate unitarity in a perturbative treatment for a given velocity.…”
Section: The Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect softens the interaction and makes perturbative treatments valid for a larger part of the phase space, resulting in a much reduced strong collision term and relatively small difference (practically zero for the present work) in the CONVPST calculations with and without the strong collision term. As a result for hydrogen and H-like lines, this effect can be accounted for analytically and this has been done for the dipole part of the interaction [2,9,10]. It is, therefore, probably not a coincidence that agreement between CONVPST and DWE is very good for all lines in the series.…”
Section: The Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and contains many useful references. Poquérusse & Alexiou (2006) have extended standard semi-classical impact theory for hydrogen-like ions to include penetrating collisions. For transitions in highly excited hydrogen-like atoms and ions Stambulchik & Maron (2008) have produced a simple analytical method for calculating line shapes and Gigosos et al (2007) have developed an exact expression for the impact broadening operator of hydrogen.…”
Section: Stark Broadeningmentioning
confidence: 99%