1978
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-51-601-29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetrameter cassette calibration to 400 kV and effects of extra-focal radiation when measuring tube filtration

Abstract: The penetrameter cassette, when used with suitable filters and calibrated against the same average wave form, can detect changes of less than 1 kV in the range 20-50 kV, 1 kV from 50-100 and from 1-4 Kv from 100-400 kV. Problems of calibration are discussed together with the necessity to use a suitable shutter with equipment which has a significant build-up and decay time during which the radiation quality may be varying. Extra-focal radiation does not normally present a significant problem in the measurement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the kV-meters that measured the effective tube voltage (RMI and Victoreen), it was not possible to derive a reference U eff value, since such a quantity has not been defined mathematically. According to their manuals the U eff had the same physical meaning as the quantity measured by the kVp test cassette method (Ardran and Crooks 1978), i.e the two waveforms supplied by the instrument's detectors, were stored in memory and summed up independently (as film does). The U eff was calculated from a ratio of the two sums (Victoreen 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the kV-meters that measured the effective tube voltage (RMI and Victoreen), it was not possible to derive a reference U eff value, since such a quantity has not been defined mathematically. According to their manuals the U eff had the same physical meaning as the quantity measured by the kVp test cassette method (Ardran and Crooks 1978), i.e the two waveforms supplied by the instrument's detectors, were stored in memory and summed up independently (as film does). The U eff was calculated from a ratio of the two sums (Victoreen 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%