Penerapan Sanksi Administratif   Dalam Putusan Perkara Tata Usaha Negara  Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Semarang

Kusmawardi, Ladju; Suteki, Suteki; Ristyawati, Aprista

doi:10.14710/lr.v14i1.20240

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Public officials themselves are state administrative officials who carry out or carry out the functions of making and implementing state legal norms, which can be called state administrative officials or public officials. (17) Withdrawal of certain rights only for crimes that are expressly determined by law, that is, the punishment is punishable by additional penalties. The length of time the revocation of rights is for life.…”

Section: Revocation Of Political Rights Of Corruption Prisonersmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Concept of Permanent Political Disclaimer in Preventing the Corruptor’s Steps

Jailani

Prasetyo

Yudianto

2020

IJMMU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Indonesia, corruption isn’t an extraordinary thing but it has become commonplace in front of the public, especially the perpetrators are state officials who have an important role. Criminal sentences for a suspect in a criminal act of corruption can be said to be severe, but it doesn’t provide a deterrent effect so that if there is a gap, the act can be recommited. Until there is a legal reform to remove certain rights inherent in everyone. The legal reform refers to the Supreme Court Decision Number 537K/pid.sus/2014 and the Supreme Court Decision Number 1195K/pid.sus/2014. Meanwhile, the criminal act of corruption itself has been regulated in Law No.20 of 2001 concerning Ammendents to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crime.

show abstract

Section: Revocation Of Political Rights Of Corruption Prisonersmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Concept of Permanent Political Disclaimer in Preventing the Corruptor’s Steps

Jailani

Prasetyo

Yudianto

2020

IJMMU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, when there is an application for the execution of a permanent legal force decision submitted by the Plaintiff, the Chairperson of the Administrative Court will call the Administration Official or Agency to impose administrative sanctions. So that the Defendant (Administration Official or Agency) does not carry out the contents of the decision (Kusmawardi, Suteki, & Ristyawati, 2018).…”

Section: Justice and Legal Certainty Of The Execution Of The Administmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Execution of the Administrative Court’s Decision; Looking for Its Justice and Legal Certainty

Hardani¹

2019

JHN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction to The Problem: The execution of the Administrative Court's decisions seems floating, and there is no final settlement. The implementation of the decision of the State Administrative judge is entirely left to the awareness of the administration official or institution. The problem is that the officials are lack of awareness due to the less supervision by a higher institution like the House of Representatives. Purpose/Objective Study: This article aims to find out the execution to carry out the Administrative court and Administrative court decisions that can provide a sense of justice and legal certainty to the public. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study in this article uses a doctrinal approach with secondary data sourced from books and journals, and is presented using a qualitative method. Findings: The study showed that the execution of the court's decision only emphasizes the sense of self-respect and legal awareness of the Administrative officials and there has been no application of forced efforts against Administrative officials if they do not implement it. Administrative actions must be following the principles of a legal constitution dominated by the norms of public policy to prevent acts of abuse of authority from higher powers. Paper Type: Research ArticleHardani 42

show abstract

“…The purpose of establishing a state administrative court is to act as a juridical controller for the actions of state administrative bodies / officials, both preventively and repressively. In addition, the aim of the state administrative court is also to provide legal protection for state administrative bodies / officials if they have acted properly in accordance with applicable legal regulations (Kusmawardi et al, 2018). Meanwhile, according to Prajudi Atmosudirdjo, the purpose of establishing the PTUN is to protect citizens whose legal interests are often oppressed or squeezed by the wider interference of the authorities into people's lives.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions: Conception, and Barriers

A¹,

Suhartono

Salam

2021

MuLaRev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to analyze how the effectiveness of the implementation of the ruling of the Administrative Court of the State and what are the factors that influence the effectiveness of the Court ruling The country. The research was carried out on the courts of The State of Makassar, data collection techniques are carried out by means of interviews and read scientific books, magazines, newspapers and other readings related to research. Results of the study showed that the effectiveness of the implementation of the ruling of the Court of The Country has not been effective, because so far there are still many Administrative Bodies and Officials of countries that are unwilling to comply with the ruling of the Court of The country, then plus the lack of participation of the parties to the dispute has led to a court could not ascertain whether a State Administrative Court ruling that has a magnitude of law has been implemented or not. As for the factors that influence the Court ruling The Country, among which is the absence of a special eksekutorial institution or institution of sanctions in carrying out the Court ruling The country, The official low awareness Countries in obeying the Court ruling The Country, the absence of more detailed provisions governing sanctions if the verdict is not implemented. Advice from the research is that, should the Government contains provisions governing the institutions eksekutorial institutions or special sanctions ruling of The judiciary of the State, so the State Administrative Court's verdict can be run and judicial administration can emerge again in the eyes of the community.

show abstract

Penerapan Sanksi Administratif Dalam Putusan Perkara Tata Usaha Negara Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Semarang

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

The Concept of Permanent Political Disclaimer in Preventing the Corruptor’s Steps

The Concept of Permanent Political Disclaimer in Preventing the Corruptor’s Steps

The Execution of the Administrative Court’s Decision; Looking for Its Justice and Legal Certainty

Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions: Conception, and Barriers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About