Penempatan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Sebagai Organ Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Ri Tahun 1945

Monteiro, Josef M

doi:10.21143/jhp.vol42.no2.277

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on the reason for the formation of the state organ, it is in accordance with the inauguration of the KPK which was motivated by public skepticism about the fragility of existing law enforcement agencies in eradicating corruption namely the National Police and the National Prosecutor [11]. Based on the public skepticism, the public is urging the bureaucracy and institutional use studies looking for the right formulation in eradicating crime corruption.…”

Section: Theoretical Aspects Of the Authority Of The Corruptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the Prosecution of Corruption in Indonesia

2020

jcr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Corruption is a reality in Indonesia and has a significant impoverishment of wealth state, and damaging the public's trust in the law. As an effort to eradicate corruption, the legislative inaugurated the Corruption Eradication Commission by the Law Number 30 of 2002. The presence of the Corruption Eradication Commission is motivated by the low public trust in law enforcement institutions, namely the Prosecutor and the Police in eradicating corruption. In eradicating corruption, the Corruption Eradication Commission has the authorities of preliminary investigation, full investigation and prosecution, whereas according to Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the authority of preliminary investigation and a full investigation is the authority of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia, and prosecution is the authority of the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia. Based on this condition, that authority of prosecution corruption case's which the corruption is one of the criminal cases opens the gate to overlapping authority between the Police with Corruption Eradication Commission and the Prosecutor with Corruption Eradication Commission. Then, this paper discusses how the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the prosecution of corruption, whether there is a possibility to overlapping authority between the Corruption Eradication Commission with the other law enforcement agencies by normative juridically that approaching with legal materials and arranged descriptively analytical. These paper findings also conclude with suggestions to strengthen the effort to eradicate corruption in Indonesia, it is necessary to make a system effectively to prevent overlapping between the Corruption Eradication Commission's authority with the other law enforcement agencies, continuing collaboration between law enforcement agencies and increasing law enforcement professionalism.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Aspects Of the Authority Of The Corruptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the Prosecution of Corruption in Indonesia

2020

jcr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Even though the CEC Law gives extraordinary authority to the CEC, in exercising its authority it does not mean there are no problems, instead there are many problems in this case, namely the corruptor fight back to the CEC using the juridical channels. Therefore, making the CEC as a constitutional organ is one of the strategies to deal with such attacks, there are several reasons why the CEC must enter the constitution (Monteiro, 2012).…”

Section: Legal Aspectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corruptor Fight Back: Identifying the Corruption Eradication Commission's Enemy in Eradicating Corruption in Indonesia

Muttaqin

2020

pijss

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (CEC) is a state institution established with the aim of improving the effectiveness of efforts to eradicate corruption. With a clear juridical foundation and real achievement, the CEC is considered successful in meeting public expectations in eradicating corruption in Indonesia. Even so, the CEC's corruption eradication agenda experienced many obstacles from those who were against corruption eradication. The parties are always trying to weaken the CEC institution even there are also efforts to dissolve the CEC. Various attempts to weaken the CEC are called corruptor fight back.

show abstract

“…Josef M Monteiro, "PENEMPATAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI SEBAGAI ORGAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA RITAHUN 1945TAHUN " (2012 42:2 J Huk Pembang 286.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Menelisik Efektivitas Konstitusi : Independensi Lembaga KPK Pasca Putusan MK No.36 Tahun 2017 Sebagai Anomali Hukum

Pattimahu,

Dony Putri,

Suputra

et al. 2023

J.KK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstrak: Indonesia menganut sistem presidensial yang saling berkaitan dengan pemisahan kekuasaan (separation power) yang dapat dilihat dari trias politika yang dipisah menjadi tiga kekuasaan yakni kekuasaan legislatif, kekuasaan eksekutif, dan kekuasaan yudikatif. Adanya pemisahan kekuasaan itu diharapkan mampu menciptakan pelaksanaan sistem Checks and balances dapat berjalan dengan baik. Dimana fungsi dari sistem tersebut untuk saling mengawasi antar lembaga satu dengan lainnya, agar tidak timbul terjadinya perilaku-perilaku yang hegemonic, tiranik, dan sentralisasi kekuasaan, akan tetapi saat ini ditemukan adanya tumpang tindih peraturan yang ada mengenai perubahan kedudukan Lembaga KPK menjadi Lembaga eksekutif di bawah naungan presiden. Hal tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan intervensi dari kekuasaan berbagai pihak. Dengan demikian Adanya pemberlakuan dari putusan MK No.36/puu-XV/2017, tentang diubahnya kedudukan lembaga KPK tersebut akan mengganggu independensi KPK dalam menjalankan tugasnya, atas perubahan kedudukan tersebut dikhawatirkan tidak akan mandiri dan bebas. Jadi, diperlukan adanya suatu perbaikan mendasar terkait dengan kedudukan lembaga KPK itu sendiri dimana lembaga KPK dijamin akan kebebasan sebagai lembaga independen tanpa adanya intervensi dari badan eksekutif diatasnya. Oleh karena itu, tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui status quo konstitusi di Indonesia, dan independensi KPK akibat dari berlakunya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi NO.36/puu-XV/2017. Dalam hal ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif serta menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Kata Kunci: konstitusi; anomaly; KPK; independensi Abstract: Indonesia adheres to a presidential system that is interrelated with the separation of powers (separation of powers) which can be seen from the trias politica which is divided into three powers namely legislative power, executive power, and judicial power. The existence of this separation of powers is expected to be able to make the implementation of the checks and balances system run well. Where the function of the system is to supervise one another between institutions, so that hegemonic, tyrannical, and centralized power does not arise, but currently there is an overlapping of existing regulations regarding the change in the position of the KPK Institution to become an executive agency in under the auspices of the president. This has the potential to cause intervention from the power of various parties. Thus the enactment of the Constitutional Court decision No.36/puu-XV/2017, concerning changing the position of the KPK institution will interfere with the independence of the KPK in carrying out its duties, it is feared that this change in position will not be independent and free. So, there is a need for a fundamental improvement related to the position of the KPK institution itself where the KPK institution is guaranteed freedom as an independent institution without any intervention from the executive body above it. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to find out the status quo of the constitution in Indonesia, and the independence of the KPK as a result of the enactment of the Constitutional Court decision NO.36/puu-XV/2017. In this case, the author uses normative legal research methods and uses a statutory approach. Keywords: constitution; anomaly; KPK; independence

show abstract

Penempatan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Sebagai Organ Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Ri Tahun 1945

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

The Authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the Prosecution of Corruption in Indonesia

The Authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the Prosecution of Corruption in Indonesia

Corruptor Fight Back: Identifying the Corruption Eradication Commission's Enemy in Eradicating Corruption in Indonesia

Menelisik Efektivitas Konstitusi : Independensi Lembaga KPK Pasca Putusan MK No.36 Tahun 2017 Sebagai Anomali Hukum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About