1959
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.54.5.944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peneconcordant uranium deposit; a proposed term

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1963
1963
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the scholarly interpretation elaborated previously on the origin of the Corocoro ores, the present chapter shows new evidence in favor of a re-definition on the ore deposit as an example of the peneconcordant type, a term used by Finch (1959), i.e., new among the evaporite-related copper-bearing deposits of the central Andes.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the scholarly interpretation elaborated previously on the origin of the Corocoro ores, the present chapter shows new evidence in favor of a re-definition on the ore deposit as an example of the peneconcordant type, a term used by Finch (1959), i.e., new among the evaporite-related copper-bearing deposits of the central Andes.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Considering the simultaneous existence of both stratabound ores and transversal structures at the Corocoro mine, the copper-bearing deposit must be redefined in the category of "peneconcordant" ore deposits, suggested initially by Finch (1959) for some uranium-bearing redbed type of ore deposits from the western United States, in which the role of the main stratabound ores is related to occurrences of subordinate veins and veinlets.…”
Section: Validity Of the Peneconcordant Tjjpementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The largest and richest uranium deposits in carbonate rocks within the United States are of the type called peneconcordant by Finch (1959). These deposits are "tabular, lenticular, or irregularly shaped masses of widely differing size that are, in general, concordant to the gross sedimentary structures of the enclosing rock burt th'3Jt, in detail, cut across sedim•entary structures.…”
Section: Peneconcordant Uranium Deposits In Carbonate Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…;Petrov and others, 1969;Fomin, 1968;Tananaeva, 1968; "Uranium resources estimates", edited by European Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, 1967;Wambeke, 1967;Tishkin, 1966;Gotman and Zubrev, 1963;Lang and others, 1962;Little, 1970;Danchev, 1961;Kotlyar, 1961;Surazhakiy, 1959Surazhakiy, , 1960Griffith and others, 1958;Robinson, 1958;Ruzicka, 1975;Tishkin and others, 1958;Klepper and Wyant, 1957;and Sullivan, 1957). The geologic classification of deposits as used in this report (table 2) is seven-fold; (1) deposits that are peneconcordant (Finch, 1959a) with the sedimentary structures of the enclosing rocks, which are predominantly sandstones (a single placer deposit is also included in this classification); (2) deposits in quartz-pebble conglomerates;…”
Section: Type Of Depositmentioning
confidence: 99%