2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penalty finite element method for Stokes problem with nonlinear slip boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the proof of Theorem 2.1, we also have the following theorem about the solution of the regularized problem (20).…”
Section: The Regularized Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the proof of Theorem 2.1, we also have the following theorem about the solution of the regularized problem (20).…”
Section: The Regularized Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y. Li and K.T. Li study the penalty finite element approximation to the Stokes problem [20] and study the pressure projection stabilized finite element approximation to the steady Navier-Stokes problem [21] and derive the optimal error estimates under the strong regularity assumption on the velocity field. In these papers, in order to construct the computational iteration schemes, the multiplier also is introduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical investigation of these later problems have benefited a lot from the existing knowledge of general ways of treating variational inequalities and some works worth to be mentioned here include [2,7,18,30,39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element methods presented in [15,18] are motivated by problems in plasticity, while the analysis in [17] uses the penalty approach in the Stokes equations to circumvent the incompressibility constraint. Using a different type of slip boundary condition R. Verfurth [20] has analyzed the problem by relaxing the constraint (1.4) at the expense of an additional unknown.…”
Section: Introduction We Consider Steady Flows Of Incompressible Vismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist many finite element discretizations for solving variational inequalities [13,14,19], steady Stokes and Navier-Stokes problems [10,13] and mixed variational inequalities [9,15,17,18]. The finite element methods presented in [15,18] are motivated by problems in plasticity, while the analysis in [17] uses the penalty approach in the Stokes equations to circumvent the incompressibility constraint.…”
Section: Introduction We Consider Steady Flows Of Incompressible Vismentioning
confidence: 99%