2019
DOI: 10.1177/0962280219884720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penalized estimation of semiparametric transformation models with interval-censored data and application to Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract: Variable selection or feature extraction is fundamental to identify important risk factors from a large number of covariates and has applications in many fields. In particular, its applications in failure time data analysis have been recognized and many methods have been proposed for right-censored data. However, developing relevant methods for variable selection becomes more challenging when one confronts interval censoring that often occurs in practice. In this article, motivated by an Alzheimer’s disease st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) The results show that APOE4 is significantly associated with AD risk at level 0.05, which is consistent with existing AD studies. In particular, the presence of APOE4 allele increases the hazard of AD diagnosis by 39.10% while Our findings are again supported by an independent study (Li et al, 2019), which applied a penalized method and consistently selected RAVLT-immediate as the only significant risk factor of AD conversion. Figure 3 presents the estimated mean functions of longitudinal outcomes by three methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) The results show that APOE4 is significantly associated with AD risk at level 0.05, which is consistent with existing AD studies. In particular, the presence of APOE4 allele increases the hazard of AD diagnosis by 39.10% while Our findings are again supported by an independent study (Li et al, 2019), which applied a penalized method and consistently selected RAVLT-immediate as the only significant risk factor of AD conversion. Figure 3 presents the estimated mean functions of longitudinal outcomes by three methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…By contrast, RAVLT‐immediate contributes through the outcome‐specific progression in addition to the shared latent progression. Our findings are again supported by an independent study (Li et al ., 2019), which applied a penalized method and consistently selected RAVLT‐immediate as the only significant risk factor of AD conversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, RAVLT-immediate contributes through the outcome-specific progression in addition to the shared latent progression. Our findings are again supported by an independent study (Li et al, 2019), which applied a penalized method and consistently selected RAVLT-immediate as the only significant risk factor of AD conversion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As mentioned above, several authors have discussed variable selection for intervalcensored failure time data ( [19,20]). However, existing methods cannot be applied directly to linear models or generalized linear models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%