Penafsiran terhadap Kewenangan Mengatur Pemerintahan Daerah dalam Melaksanakan Urusan Pemerintahan melalui Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah (Interpretation of the Regional Government’s Authority to Regulate in Implementing Government Affairs through the ... )

Abstract

The Elucidation of the 2014 Local Government Law has divided the concurrent government affairs between the central government and local governments in detail. To carry out government affairs, local governments have the authority to stipulate regional regulation. The existence of that specific list of concurrent affairs, therefore, raises a question regarding what extent the local government can “elaborates” the government affairs that become their domain in the formulation of regional regulation. This research focuses on two questions: (1) regarding constitutional construction of local government’s authority to regulate; and (2) interpretation of the implementation of the authority to regulate in the formulation of regional regulation. This normative legal research is descriptive, evaluative, and prescriptive in nature. The results indicate alternative interpretations of the authority to regulate, namely implementation in (1) a legalistic-formal approach, through the rigid implementation of the authority and NSPK set by the Government; (2) a normative-extensive approach, by implementing the authority and NSPK, as well as paying attention to the Region’s needs; and (3) a supra-extensive approach, in which the Region goes beyond the corridors of their authority and the NSPK. For this reason, the author suggests that in the formulation of the NSPK, the accuracy of the Central Government is needed, so that can serve as a guideline for implementing flexible government affairs and can accommodate the legal needs of the community in the regions. abstrakLampiran UU Pemda 2014 telah membagi secara detail urusan pemerintahan konkuren antara pemerintah pusat dengan pemerintahan daerah. Untuk melaksanakan urusan pemerintahan konkuren tersebut, pemerintahan daerah memiliki kewenangan untuk menetapkan peraturan daerah. Kehadiran daftar urusan pemerintahan yang spesifik menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai sejauh mana pemerintahan daerah dapat “menjabarkan” urusan pemerintahan yang menjadi domain kewenangannya dalam pembentukan peraturan daerah. Penelitian ini berfokus pada dua permasalahan, yaitu: (1) konstruksi konstitusional kewenangan mengatur pemerintahan daerah; dan (2) penafsiran terhadap kewenangan mengatur urusan pemerintahan oleh pemerintahan daerah dalam pembentukan peraturan daerah. Penelitian hukum normatif ini dilakukan dengan mengkaji data sekunder, dengan sifat penelitian deskriptif, serta berbentuk evaluatif dan preskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya alternatif penafsiran terhadap kewenangan mengatur urusan pemerintahan dalam pembentukan peraturan daerah, yaitu: (1) pelaksanaan kewenangan mengatur secara legalistik-formal, mendasarkan kewenangan dan NSPK yang ditetapkan Pemerintah secara kaku; (2) pelaksanaan kewenangan mengatur secara normatif-ekstensif, yaitu selain mendasarkan pada kewenangan dan NSPK, Daerah juga memperhatikan kebutuhan hukum di Daerah; dan (3) pelaksanaan kewenangan mengatur secara supra-ekstensif, dimana Daerah mengatur melebihi koridor kewenangan dan NSPK. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, disarankan dalam perumusan NSPK diperlukan kecermatan Pemerintah Pusat, sehingga dapat menjadi pedoman pelaksanaan urusan pemerintahan yang luwes dan dapat mengakomodasi kebutuhan hukum masyarakat di daerah.

Arrangement of Selected Government Affairs in the Implementation of Broad Autonomy in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia

“…The implementation of selected government affairs in regions with obligations must be based on the NSPK (Wicaksono & Rahman, 2020), in the future, it must be redesigned by establishing a general NSPK to accommodate regional uniqueness and potential. In this option, the NSPK only regulates the basic provisions (principles and principles) that the regions must guide to avoid conflict with national strategic development.…”

The Role of the Regional Government of Sampang Madura Regency in Managing Coastal Tourism as an Alternative Livelihood for Fishermen's Families

“…This is important because Madura, especially Sampang, is a very large coastal area and has many potential areas to become tourism, but inadequate transportation and supporting facilities, a weak government administration system, a lack of human resource capacity, and so many people depend on coastal and marine resources for their livelihoods. (15) The Importance of Coastal Tourism Development Regulations in the form of regional regulations is a form of implementing protection for fishermen regulated in Article 16-41 of Law Number 7 of 2016, the protection strategy consists of a. provision of fishery business infrastructure, b. ease of obtaining fishery business facilities, c. business certainty guarantee, d. fish catching and fish farming risk guarantee, e. eliminating high-cost economic practices, f. fishery commodity import control, g. guarantee of security and safety, and h. facilitation and legal assistance. The implementation of empowerment is regulated in Articles 43-58.…”

“…The empowerment strategy consists of a. education and training, b. counseling and assistance, c. business partnership, d. ease of access to science, technology and information, and e. institutional strengthening. [15] According to Government Regulation Number 50 of 2015 concerning the Empowerment of Small Fishermen and Small Fish Raising, empowering small fishermen and small fish cultivators is an effort to improve the ability of small fishermen and small fish cultivators to carry out their activities better. The scope of empowering small fishermen is a. financing and capital, b. education, training, and counseling in the field of fisheries, c. growth and development of small fishing groups and small fish cultivating groups, d. implementation of fishing by small fishermen and fish cultivation by small fish cultivators, and e. partnership.As an example the folowing is income for the Lon Malang Beach levy as follows : According to the Head of Sampang Tourism Development, the policy or focus on tourism development must prioritize "public awareness" regarding tourism potential and managing tourism well, that is the first thing that is important.…”

Social Policy in the Implementation of Concurrent Government Affairs in the Nias Archipelago Area, Indonesia

“…The governor's authority as the representative of the central government in the regions does not clarify the exercise of authority in the administration of concurrent government affairs (N ugraha, 2021). Concurrent government affairs should be flexible and able to accommodate the needs of local communities (Wicaksono & Rahman, 2020). Improving regional community services is important to implement through new autonomous regional structuring policies to improve public services, welfare, shorten the span of control, and equitable development (Undang et al, 2022).…”