2021
DOI: 10.25077/jfu.10.4.540-547.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pemetaan Struktur Bawah Permukaan di sekitar Manifestasi Panas Bumi Desa Sungai Tutung Kerinci Menggunakan Metode Geomagnetik

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Metode ini memiliki keunggulan dimana pengoperasiannya lebih sederhana dan ketelitian yang cukup baik. Data anomali medan magnet telah digunakan dalam memperkirakan keberadaan daerah panas bumi (Daud et al, 2018;Hadi et al, 2020;Maulana et al, 2014;Simbolon et al, 2020;Suci and Putra, 2021). Penggunaan metode ini akan memberikan gambaran umum keberadaan sistem panas bumi di Sumani.…”
Section: Iunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metode ini memiliki keunggulan dimana pengoperasiannya lebih sederhana dan ketelitian yang cukup baik. Data anomali medan magnet telah digunakan dalam memperkirakan keberadaan daerah panas bumi (Daud et al, 2018;Hadi et al, 2020;Maulana et al, 2014;Simbolon et al, 2020;Suci and Putra, 2021). Penggunaan metode ini akan memberikan gambaran umum keberadaan sistem panas bumi di Sumani.…”
Section: Iunclassified
“…Kontinuasi pada ketinggian 100 m digunakan untuk melakukan pemodelan 2D struktur bawah permukaan karena sudah terlihat anomali magnetik regional dan tidak menghilangkan seluruh pengaruh dari anomali magnetik lokal. Hal yang sama juga dilakukan oleh (Suci and Putra, 2021) di daerah panas bumi Desa Sungai Tutung. Hasil kontinuasi ke atas menunjukkan area anomali magnetik negatif atau rendah semakin dominan di daerah selatan Daerah penelitian yang dapat menjadi zona prospek panas bumi.…”
Section: Kontinuasi Ke Atasunclassified
“…The rock units are as follows: (1) Mandalika Formation volcanic sandstone and breccia; (2) Arjosari Formation volcanic rock and sandstone; (3) igneous diorite rock as an intrusive body; and (4) sedimentary alluvial in the Pacitan River Basin [7]. Lestari [8] conducted a subsurface interpretation study of the Karangrejo hot spring and found volcanic and intrusive igneous rocks. The modeling by Lestari [8] corresponds with the Pacitan geological map which states that the study area consists of the Arjosari and Mandalika formations which are dominated by volcanic breccias and lava.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lestari [8] conducted a subsurface interpretation study of the Karangrejo hot spring and found volcanic and intrusive igneous rocks. The modeling by Lestari [8] corresponds with the Pacitan geological map which states that the study area consists of the Arjosari and Mandalika formations which are dominated by volcanic breccias and lava. In addition, the andesitic lava was identified as the caprock of the Karangrejo-Tinatar geothermal system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of this method is based on the value and distribution of subsurface rock susceptibility which is closely related to the structure and geothermal system [9]- [14] in Kepahiang. The magnetic method is a very effective and efficient application for geothermal exploration because it can determine geothermal prospects by looking at the horizontal and vertical distribution based on rock susceptibility values [9], [11], [12], [14][15][16]. The specific objectives of this study were (1) to map the magnetic anomalies of the geothermal field in Kepahiang, (2) to determine the lithology and rock formations of each layer to the maximum depth obtained from measurements based on rock susceptibility values, (3) the geological structure and its distribution on the administrative map of Kepahiang and its relationship to the activity of Mount Kaba and the Sumatran fault, and (4) the zone of altered rock distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%