2017
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31601-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

40
746
1
14

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,005 publications
(801 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
40
746
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients with BRAF wild‐type melanoma, the first‐line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is recommended by European Society for Medical Oncology due to the lack of effective targeted treatment available. However, for patients with BRAF mutated melanoma, because previous studies have revealed that nivolumab and pembrolizumab, two PD‐1 inhibitors approved by FDA, can improve the survival in patients with BRAF‐inhibitor‐refractory or BRAF‐mutant disease, the best therapy option is unclear. Accordingly, consideration of patient‐specific characteristics, such as biochemical and clinicopathological features, and patient tolerance of toxicity should be weighed as the highest priorities when determining frontline treatment for patients with BRAF mutated melanoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with BRAF wild‐type melanoma, the first‐line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is recommended by European Society for Medical Oncology due to the lack of effective targeted treatment available. However, for patients with BRAF mutated melanoma, because previous studies have revealed that nivolumab and pembrolizumab, two PD‐1 inhibitors approved by FDA, can improve the survival in patients with BRAF‐inhibitor‐refractory or BRAF‐mutant disease, the best therapy option is unclear. Accordingly, consideration of patient‐specific characteristics, such as biochemical and clinicopathological features, and patient tolerance of toxicity should be weighed as the highest priorities when determining frontline treatment for patients with BRAF mutated melanoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17-21 Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitory pathway has resulted in objective responses in 17%-28% of advanced melanoma patients, 12%-27% of renal cell cancer patients, 10%-18% of non-small cell lung cancer patients and 20% of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. 22-25 In contrast, CRC patients hardly respond to PD-1 and PD-L1 blocking antibodies, 23-26 except for the minority of patients who are with mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient CRC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portanto, a dimensão dos resultados não deve ser interpretada em valores absolutos. Além disso, embora o pembrolizumabe tenha indicação ampla para tratamento de melanoma irressecável ou metastático, seu estudo pivotal não apresentou resultados de mediana de SLP para a subpopulação de pacientes com mutação BRAF V600 (Schachter, 2017), informação necessária para o cálculo do NNT e do COPE, sendo excluído dessa comparação. Entretanto, como mencionado anteriormente, na escassez de dados farmacoeconômicos de NNT e COPE, este estudo apresenta valor e peso como pioneiro para novas análises econômicas para o tratamento de pacientes com melanoma irressecável ou metastático com mutação BRAF V600, em primeira linha de tratamento.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified