2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelvic MRI as the “gold standard” in the subsequent evaluation of ultrasound-indeterminate adnexal lesions: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
60
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Several attempts to address failures in imaging methods are currently underway; they range from the modelling of US evaluation and reporting, such as the simple rules of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group (6, 7), to the proposition ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol • 67 Uterine cancer 1 (13) Other (lymphoma) 1 (1.3)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several attempts to address failures in imaging methods are currently underway; they range from the modelling of US evaluation and reporting, such as the simple rules of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group (6, 7), to the proposition ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol • 67 Uterine cancer 1 (13) Other (lymphoma) 1 (1.3)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI has the best potential for preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses. It has shown greater accuracy (88.9%) than transvaginal US (63.9%) in the characterization of adnexal masses as malignant, and better specificity (83.7% vs. 39.5%) (13). Systematic reviews showed that MRI has improved the preoperative evaluation of suspicious adnexal lesions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding conventional CT imaging, BML lung lesions appear as well-circumscribed, multiple bilateral nodules ranging from several millimiters to any centimeters, generally not calcified. Whole-body PET/CT using F-18 FDG [7] is largely used with the aim to differentiate malignant from benign uterine tumors; in general myomatous lesions have a low uptake of 18-FDG [8] while uterine sarcomas show a significantly higher uptake.…”
Section: [3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that MRI demonstrates sensitivity of 67 to 100% and specificity of 77 to 100% in the diagnosis of cancer. 14,15 These analysis also imply that MRI in some circumstance is recommended as second-line investigation for the characterization of complex adnexal masses that are indeterminate on US, although it is a more inexpensive investigation and is less readily available than US. …”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%