2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelvic floor muscle training versus watchful waiting or pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POPPS): Design and participant baseline characteristics of two parallel pragmatic randomized controlled trials in primary care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants provided written informed consent. An extensive description of the design is provided elsewhere [18]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants provided written informed consent. An extensive description of the design is provided elsewhere [18]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Data were collected during the baseline assessment prior to randomisation and concerned women both with and without a pelvic organ prolapse.…”
Section: Methods Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants gave written informed consent. The study protocol 11 and short-term results 12 have been reported previously.…”
Section: Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%